首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education >How Medical Students Conceptualize Disability: Implications for Interprofessional Practice and Education
【24h】

How Medical Students Conceptualize Disability: Implications for Interprofessional Practice and Education

机译:医学生如何将残疾概念化:对跨专业实践和教育的启示

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: This study explored whether medical students at a Canadian university conceptualize health and disability from a biomedical or biopsychosocial perspective. The World Health Organization's (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) served as the theoretical basis for this exploration. Methods: A written survey was administered to capture medical students' conceptualizations of health and disability. The survey included questions explicitly related to the constructs of universalism, nonlinearity, social and environmental factors, personal factors, participation, aspects of language and biopsychosocial health perspectives. The survey was also designed to include both theoretical and scenario-based questions related to biopsychosocial concepts of disability. The survey was distributed to and completed by a senior medical school class at a Canadian university. Results: In total, 82 out of 131 medical students completed the survey. Observed trends suggested that for theory-based questions, respondents exhibited close agreement with biopsychosocial perspectives of health and disability. Scenariobased questions resulted in more variability among respondents compared to theory-based questions. When students who previously had been introduced to the ICF were compared with students who had not, those familiar with the ICF more consistently exhibited a biopsychosocial perspective of health and disability; however these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Overall, senior medical students in this study were generally found to conceptualize disability using a biopsychosocial orientation. This result was more pronounced among students who were previously familiar with the ICF. Interestingly, a biopsychosocial orientation was not consistently maintained for scenario-based questions for all respondents. Our current healthcare climate requires that the concept of health move beyond a biomedical perspective to a more holistic biopsychosocial perspective. This change in perspective is of particular importance as movement towards team-based models of care continues to gain momentum. Closing conceptual and language-based gaps related to concepts of health and disability among all healthcare professionals is pertinent to improving interprofessional collaboration and service provision. The ICF presents a framework and language that is relevant across all health professions. Increased use of the ICF in health professional education and training could significantly contribute to increased interdisciplinary success.
机译:背景:本研究探讨了加拿大大学的医学生是否从生物医学或生物心理社会的角度来概念化健康和残疾。世界卫生组织(WHO)的功能,残疾与健康国际分类(ICF)为这一探索提供了理论基础。方法:进行了书面调查,以捕捉医学生对健康和残疾的概念。该调查包括与普遍性,非线性,社会和环境因素,个人因素,参与,语言和生物心理社会健康方面的观点明确相关的问题。该调查还旨在包括与残疾的生物心理社会概念有关的理论问题和基于情景的问题。该调查已分发给加拿大一所大学的高级医学院,并由其完成。结果:总共131名医学生中的82名完成了调查。观察到的趋势表明,对于基于理论的问题,受访者表现出与健康和残疾的生物心理社会学观点密切一致。与基于理论的问题相比,基于情景的问题导致受访者之间的差异更大。当将以前被介绍过ICF的学生与未接受过ICF的学生进行比较时,熟悉ICF的学生会更加一致地展现出健康和残疾的生物心理学视角。但是这些差异在统计上并不显着。结论:总体而言,本研究中的高级医学生通常被发现使用生物心理社会取向来概念化残疾。在以前熟悉ICF的学生中,这一结果更为明显。有趣的是,对于所有受访者而言,对于基于情境的问题,生物心理社会取向并没有得到持续保持。我们当前的医疗环境要求健康的概念从生物医学的观点转变为更全面的生物心理社会的观点。随着向基于团队的护理模式发展的势头不断发展,这种观点的转变尤为重要。缩小所有医疗保健专业人员之间与健康和残疾概念有关的概念和基于语言的鸿沟,与改善专业之间的协作和服务提供有关。 ICF提出了与所有卫生专业相关的框架和语言。在卫生专业教育和培训中增加使用ICF可能会大大促进跨学科成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号