...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice >Blending Formative and Summative Assessment in a Capstone Subject: ‘It’s not your tools, it’s how you use them’
【24h】

Blending Formative and Summative Assessment in a Capstone Subject: ‘It’s not your tools, it’s how you use them’

机译:将形成性评估和总结性评估相结合,达到顶峰主题:“这不是您的工具,而是您使用工具的方式”

获取原文
           

摘要

Discussions about the relationships between formative and summative assessment have come full circle after decades of debate. For some time formative assessment with its emphasis on feedback to students was promoted as better practice than traditional summative assessment. Summative assessment practices were broadly criticised as distanced from the learning process. More recently discussions have refocused on the potential complementary characteristics of formative and summative purposes of assessment. However studies on practical designs to link formative and summative assessment in constructive ways are rare. In paramedic education, like many other professional disciplines, strong traditions of summative assessment - assessment ‘of’ learning - have long dominated. Communities require that a graduate has been judged fit to practice. The assessment redesign described and evaluated in this paper sought to rebalance assessment relationships in a capstone paramedic subject to integrate formative assessment for learning with summative assessment of learning. Assessment was repositioned as a communication process about learning. Through a variety of frequent assessment events, judgement of student performance is accompanied with rich feedback. Each assessment event provides information about learning, unique to each student’s needs. Each assessment event shaped subsequent assessment events. Student participants in the formal evaluation of the subject indicated high levels of perceived value and effectiveness on learning across each of the assessment events, with broad agreement also demonstrated relating to student perceptions for preparedness: ‘readiness to practice’. Our approach focused on linking assessment events, resulted in assessments providing formative communication to students and summative outcome information to others simultaneously. The formative-summative dichotomy disappeared: all assessment became part of communication about learning.
机译:经过数十年的辩论,关于形成性评估与总结性评估之间关系的讨论已全面展开。一段时间以来,注重于向学生反馈的形成性评估被推荐为比传统的总结性评估更好的实践。人们普遍批评总结性评估实践与学习过程相距甚远。最近,讨论重新集中在评估的形成性和总结性目的的潜在补充特征上。但是,很少以建设性的方式对将形成性评估和总结性评估联系起来的实际设计进行研究。像许多其他专业学科一样,在护理人员教育中,总结性评估(学习评估)的悠久传统长期占据主导地位。社区要求已判定毕业生适合实践。本文中描述和评估的评估重新设计旨在重新平衡顶级护理人员的评估关系,以将学习的形成性评估与学习的总结性评估相结合。评估被重新定位为关于学习的沟通过程。通过各种频繁的评估活动,对学生表现的判断伴随着丰富的反馈。每个评估事件都提供有关学习的信息,这是每个学生的需求所特有的。每个评估事件都会影响后续的评估事件。对该主题进行正式评估的学生参与者表示,在每个评估事件中学习的感知价值和学习水平都很高,并且广泛的共识还表明与学生对准备的感知有关:“准备好练习”。我们的方法侧重于链接评估事件,从而进行评估,向学生提供形成性的交流,同时向其他人提供总结性的结果信息。形成性和总结性的二分法消失了:所有评估都成为学习交流的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号