...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of research practice >Sensitive Research and the Collision of Advocacy and Research: Consequences for the Researcher
【24h】

Sensitive Research and the Collision of Advocacy and Research: Consequences for the Researcher

机译:敏感研究与倡导与研究的碰撞:研究人员的后果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Doing sensitive research presents particular problems over and above other social science research because of the nature of the issues being asked about and their potential impact on both the participant and the researcher. In some instances, the factors that engage the researcher in the project may also be of interest to advocates who are working for the benefit of the participants in the research. In the current instance, the researcher was interested in understanding the impact of “life without” the possibility of parole on the lives of women convicted of killing their abusers, as well as the impact of their imprisonment and clemency on their families. At the same time, a powerful advocacy group was devoted to gaining clemency for the women. The resulting clash between the goals and purposes of these two entities resulted in a significant impasse and unanticipated consequences for the research agenda as well as the researcher. Analysis of one specific research project and the problems resulting from the clash between researcher and advocates can contribute to the literature on sensitive research as well as on the clashes between advocacy and social science research.
机译:由于所询问问题的性质及其对参与者和研究者的潜在影响,进行敏感的研究会比其他社会科学研究带来更多的特殊问题。在某些情况下,使研究人员参与项目的因素也可能引起那些为研究参与者的利益而努力的倡导者的兴趣。在目前的情况下,研究人员有兴趣了解假释的可能性,即“没有假生命”对被判杀害施虐者的妇女的生活以及监禁和宽恕对家庭的影响。同时,一个强大的倡导团体致力于让妇女宽大处理。这两个实体的目标和目的之间的冲突导致研究议程以及研究人员陷入严重的僵局和无法预料的后果。对一个具体研究项目以及研究者与倡导者之间的冲突所产生的问题的分析,可以为有关敏感研究以及倡导与社会科学研究之间的冲突的文献做出贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号