首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Agricultural Research >Comparative Evaluation of the Cooking Time, Nutritional and Sensory Properties of Meals Prepared with Whole, Semi-polished and Polished Rice Grains
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of the Cooking Time, Nutritional and Sensory Properties of Meals Prepared with Whole, Semi-polished and Polished Rice Grains

机译:全谷物,半谷物和抛光稻谷米制饭的烹饪时间,营养和感官特性的比较评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Encouraging the consumption of whole grains may be a feasible and easy measure to combat non-communicable diseases which are the major causes of death globally. This experimental study was therefore designed to compare the cooking time, nutritional and sensory properties of meals prepared with whole, semi-polished and polished rice grains with the view of encouraging the consumption of whole rice gains in place of the refined ones. White rice, curried rice and jollof rice were prepared with whole, semi-polished and polished rice grains using basic ingredients of standard recipes. Cooking time, nutritional and sensory evaluation were determined using appropriate standard procedures. Mean data were compared using Analysis of Variance at p≤0.05. For whole rice cooking time (minutes) for white, curried and jollof rice was: 30.33, 29.33 and 25.33; for semi-polished rice these was: 31.33, 32.00 and 38.00 while for polished rice it was: 32.33, 36.00 and 30.33 respectively. The proximate composition (% in DWB) of white rice prepared with whole, semi-polished and polished rice grains were as follows: Protein (9.80, 9.37, 8.70); Fat (4.19, 2.22, 0.78); Ash (3.20, 2.22, 2.01); Crude fibre (4.80, 1.95, 1.56) and Carbohydrate (78.01, 84.24, 86.95). White rice prepared with whole rice and semi-polished rice was significantly higher (p≤0.05) than polished rice in niacin and riboflavin but surprisingly, the meal from polished rice was highest in thiamine content. White rice, curried rice and jollof rice prepared with whole rice grains were comparable in flavour, texture, taste aroma and overall acceptability with those prepared with semi-polished and polished rice, however, there is need to improve on the colour and appearance as well as construction of rice milling machine that can dehusk only. The cooking time and sensory properties of whole rice dishes were comparable with that of the refined ones while the nutritive value was notably higher. Household and commercial preparation and consumption of whole rice dishes is hereby encouraged but the major militating factor, which is the unavailability of milling machine that can only dehusk, is a factor of utmost necessary concern.
机译:鼓励食用全谷物,这是与非传染性疾病作斗争的一种可行而简便的措施,而非传染性疾病是全球主要的死亡原因。因此,本实验研究旨在比较用全谷粒,半谷粒和精制米粒制备的饭菜的烹饪时间,营养和感官特性,以鼓励食用全米代替精制米。白米饭,咖喱饭和矮米饭均使用标准配方的基本成分,全谷粒,半抛光谷粒和精米制成。使用适当的标准程序确定烹饪时间,营养和感官评估。使用方差分析(p≤0.05)比较平均数据。对于白米,咖喱米和软米饭,全米的烹饪时间(分钟)为:30.33、29.33和25.33;半精米分别为:31.33、32.00和38.00,而精米分别为:32.33、36.00和30.33。用完整,半抛光和精制米粒制备的白米的近似组成(以DWB为单位)如下:蛋白质(9.80、9.37、8.70);脂肪(4.19,2.22,0.78);灰分(3.20,2.22,2.01);粗纤维(4.80,1.95,1.56)和碳水化合物(78.01,84.24,86.95)。用全米和半抛光米制得的白米的烟酸和核黄素含量显着高于精米(p≤0.05),但令人惊讶的是,精米中的膳食中硫胺素含量最高。用全米制成的白米,咖喱米和矮米饭在风味,质地,味道香气和总体可接受性方面与用半抛光和精制米制成的白米,咖喱米和矮米饭相当,但是还需要改善其颜色和外观作为只能脱壳的碾米机的构造。全米饭的烹饪时间和感官特性与精制米饭相当,而营养价值却更高。因此,鼓励家庭和商业准备和食用全米饭,但是最主要的限制因素是必须脱颖而出,这是铣刨机无法使用而只能脱壳的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号