首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Thromboprophylaxis for Patients with High-risk Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Discharged from the Emergency Department
【24h】

Thromboprophylaxis for Patients with High-risk Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Discharged from the Emergency Department

机译:急诊出院高危房颤并扑动的患者的血栓预防

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Many patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (AF/FL) who are high risk for ischemic stroke are not receiving evidence-based thromboprophylaxis. We examined anticoagulant prescribing within 30 days of receiving dysrhythmia care for non-valvular AF/FL in the emergency department (ED). Methods: This prospective study included non-anticoagulated adults at high risk for ischemic stroke (ATRIA score ≥7) who received emergency AF/FL care and were discharged home from seven community EDs between May 2011 and August 2012. We characterized oral anticoagulant prescribing patterns and identified predictors of receiving anticoagulants within 30 days of the index ED visit. We also describe documented reasons for withholding anticoagulation. Results: Of 312 eligible patients, 128 (41.0%) were prescribed anticoagulation at ED discharge or within 30 days. Independent predictors of anticoagulation included age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.89 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.96); ED cardiology consultation (aOR 1.89, 95% CI [1.10-3.23]); and failure of sinus restoration by time of ED discharge (aOR 2.65, 95% CI [1.35-5.21]). Reasons for withholding anticoagulation at ED discharge were documented in 139 of 227 cases (61.2%), the most common of which were deferring the shared decision-making process to the patient’s outpatient provider, perceived bleeding risk, patient refusal, and restoration of sinus rhythm. Conclusion: Approximately 40% of non-anticoagulated AF/FL patients at high risk for stroke who presented for emergency dysrhythmia care were prescribed anticoagulation within 30 days. Physicians were less likely to anticoagulate older patients and those with ED sinus restoration. Opportunities exist to improve rates of thromboprophylaxis in this high-risk population.
机译:简介:许多患有缺血性中风的房颤或房扑(AF / FL)患者没有接受循证的血栓预防。我们在急诊科(ED)接受心律不齐治疗非瓣膜性AF / FL的30天内检查了抗凝剂的处方。方法:这项前瞻性研究包括2011年5月至2012年8月间接受紧急AF / FL护理并从七个社区急诊科出院的缺血性卒中高危非抗凝成人(ATRIA评分≥7)。我们对口服抗凝药的处方模式进行了表征并确定在ED访视后30天内接受抗凝药的预测因素。我们还描述了保留抗凝治疗的书面原因。结果:在312名合格患者中,有128名(41.0%)在ED出院时或30天内被处方抗凝治疗。抗凝的独立预测因子包括年龄(校正比值比[aOR]每年0.89,95%置信区间[CI] 0.82-0.96); ED心脏病咨询(aOR 1.89,95%CI [1.10-3.23]); ED放电时间导致窦恢复失败(aOR 2.65,95%CI [1.35-5.21])。在227例病例中有139例记录了在ED出院时拒绝抗凝的原因,其中最常见的是将共同的决策过程推迟给患者的门诊医生,感觉到出血风险,患者拒绝治疗以及恢复窦性心律。结论:约有40%的发生卒中高危的非抗凝AF / FL患者在需要紧急心律失常护理的30天内接受抗凝治疗。内科医生对老年患者和ED窦修复的患者进行抗凝治疗的可能性较小。在这种高危人群中存在改善血栓预防率的机会。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号