...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Prehospital infection control and prevention in Denmark: a cross-sectional study on guideline adherence and microbial contamination of surfaces
【24h】

Prehospital infection control and prevention in Denmark: a cross-sectional study on guideline adherence and microbial contamination of surfaces

机译:丹麦院前感染的控制和预防:指南依从性和表面微生物污染的横断面研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Prehospital acute care and treatment have become more complex, and while invasive procedures are standard procedures, focus on infection control and prevention is scarce. We aimed to evaluate guideline adherence, microbial contamination, and associated risk factors. In a nationwide cross-sectional study, we evaluated guideline adherence to thorough cleaning (TC) once a day, and moderate cleaning (MC) in-between patient courses. Microbial contamination on hand-touch sites (HTS) and provider-related sites (PRS) was assessed by total aerobic colony forming units (CFU) and presence of selected pathogens, using swab and agar imprints. Also, microbial contamination was assessed in relation to potential risk factors. 80 ambulances and emergency medical service (EMS) providers were enrolled. Adherence to guidelines regarding TC was 35%, but regarding MC it was 100%. In total, 129 (27%) of 480 HTS presented a total CFU?>?2.5/cm2 and/or pathogenic growth, indicating hygiene failures. The prevalence of selected pathogens on HTS was: S. aureus 7%; Enterococcus 3% and Enterobacteriaceae 1%. Total CFU on the PRS ranged from 0 to 250/cm2, and the prevalence of pathogens was 18% (S. aureus 15%, Enterococcus 3% and Enterobacteriaceae 0.3%). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was found in one sample, and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in two. No Enterobacteriaceae with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases were recorded. Guideline adherence was suboptimal, and many HTS did not comply fully with proposed standards for cleanliness. Pathogens were demonstrated on both HTS and PRS, indicating that the EMS may be a source of infection in hospitalized patients. Moreover, cleaning effort and time appears associated with microbial contamination, but a comprehensive investigation of risk factors is needed.
机译:院前急诊护理和治疗已经变得更加复杂,尽管侵入性手术是标准程序,但很少集中于控制和预防感染。我们旨在评估指南的依从性,微生物污染以及相关的风险因素。在一项全国性的横断面研究中,我们评估了每天坚持一次彻底清洁(TC)和两次患者疗程之间中度清洁(MC)的指南依从性。使用拭子和琼脂印记通过总需氧菌落形成单位(CFU)和选定病原体的存在来评估手触摸部位(HTS)和提供者相关部位(PRS)上的微生物污染。此外,还评估了与潜在危险因素有关的微生物污染。招募了80辆救护车和紧急医疗服务(EMS)提供者。遵守有关TC的准则的比例为35%,而关于MC的遵循率为100%。总共480例HTS中有129例(27%)总CFU≥2.5/ cm2和/或病原体生长,表明卫生状况不佳。 HTS上选定病原体的患病率为:金黄色葡萄球菌7%;肠球菌3%,肠杆菌科1%。 PRS上的总CFU在0到250 / cm2之间,病原体的患病率为18%(金黄色葡萄球菌15%,肠球菌3%和肠杆菌科0.3%)。在一个样品中发现了耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌,在两个样品中发现了耐万古霉素的肠球菌。没有记录到具有广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌科。准则遵守情况欠佳,许多HTS并未完全符合提议的清洁标准。 HTS和PRS均显示病原体,表明EMS可能是住院患者的感染源。此外,清洁工作和时间似乎与微生物污染有关,但是需要对危险因素进行全面调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号