首页> 外文期刊>Nutrients >Prevention and Management of Cow’s Milk Allergy in Non-Exclusively Breastfed Infants
【24h】

Prevention and Management of Cow’s Milk Allergy in Non-Exclusively Breastfed Infants

机译:非独占性母乳喂养婴儿的牛奶过敏的预防和管理

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: The prevention and management of cow milk allergy (CMA) is still debated. Since CMA is much less frequent in breastfed infants, breastfeeding should be stimulated. Method: Literature was searched using databases to find original papers and reviews on this topic. Results: Hydrolysates with a clinical proof of efficacy are recommended in the prevention and treatment of CMA. However, not all meta-analyses conclude that hydrolysates do prevent CMA or other atopic manifestations such as atopic dermatitis. There are pros and cons to consider partially hydrolysed protein as an option for starter infant formula for each non-exclusively breastfed infant. A challenge test is still recommended as the most specific and sensitive diagnostic test, although a positive challenge test does not proof that the immune system is involved. The Cow Milk Symptom Score (CoMiSS?) is an awareness tool that enables healthcare professionals to better recognize symptoms related to the ingestion of cow milk, but it still needs validation as diagnostic tool. The current recommended elimination diet is a cow milk based extensive hydrolysate, although rice hydrolysates or soy infant formula can be considered in some cases. About 10 to 15% of infants allergic to cow milk will also react to soy. Mainly because of the higher cost, amino acid based formula is reserved for severe cases. There is no place for infant formula with intact protein from other animals as cross-over allergenicity is high. During recent years, attention focused also on the bifidogenic effect of prebiotics and more recently also on human milk oligosaccharides. A bifidogenic gastrointestinal microbiome may decrease the risk to develop allergic disease. The addition of probiotics and prebiotics to the elimination diet in treatment may enhance the development of tolerance development. Conclusion: Breastfeeding is the best way to feed infants. Cow milk based extensive hydrolysates remain the first option for the treatment of CMA for the majority of patients, while amino acid formulas are reserved for the most severe cases. Rice hydrolysates and soy infant formula are second choice options. Partial hydrolysates with clinical proof of efficacy are recommended in some guidelines in the prevention of CMA and allergic disease in at risk infants, and may be considered as an option as protein source in starter infant formula.
机译:简介:牛奶过敏(CMA)的预防和管理仍存在争议。由于母乳喂养的婴儿发生CMA的频率要低得多,因此应鼓励母乳喂养。方法:使用数据库搜索文献,以找到有关该主题的原始论文和评论。结果:建议在临床上预防和治疗CMA具有临床有效性的水解物。但是,并非所有荟萃分析都得出结论,水解产物确实可以预防CMA或其他特应性表现,例如特应性皮炎。对于每个非排他性母乳喂养的婴儿来说,考虑将部分水解的蛋白质作为入门级婴儿配方食品的选择是有利有弊。仍然建议使用挑战测试作为最具体,最敏感的诊断测试,尽管阳性挑战测试不能证明免疫系统参与其中。牛奶症状评分(CoMiSS?)是一种意识工具,可使医疗保健专业人员更好地识别与摄入牛奶有关的症状,但仍需要验证作为诊断工具。尽管在某些情况下可以考虑使用大米水解物或大豆婴儿配方奶粉,但目前建议的消除饮食是基于牛奶的大量水解物。大约10%至15%的对牛奶过敏的婴儿也会对大豆产生反应。主要由于成本较高,氨基酸配方食品仅适用于严重情况。由于交叉变应原性很高,因此没有婴儿配方奶粉中含有来自其他动物的完整蛋白的地方。近年来,注意力还集中在益生元的双歧作用上,最近也集中在人乳寡糖上。双歧源胃肠道微生物组可以降低发生过敏性疾病的风险。在治疗中向消除饮食中添加益生菌和益生元可以增强耐受性的发展。结论:母乳喂养是婴儿喂养的最佳方法。对于大多数患者,以牛奶为基础的大量水解产物仍然是治疗CMA的首选,而氨基酸配方则保留给最严重的病例。大米水解物和大豆婴儿配方奶粉是第二选择。在某些指南中,建议在高危婴儿中预防CMA和过敏性疾病,并使用具有临床疗效证明的部分水解产物,并可以将其视为婴儿配方食品中的蛋白质来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号