首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition Journal >The effect of peanut and grain bar preloads on postmeal satiety, glycemia, and weight loss in healthy individuals: an acute and a chronic randomized intervention trial
【24h】

The effect of peanut and grain bar preloads on postmeal satiety, glycemia, and weight loss in healthy individuals: an acute and a chronic randomized intervention trial

机译:花生和谷物棒的预紧力对健康人餐后饱腹感,血糖和体重减轻的影响:一项急性和慢性随机干预试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Peanut consumption favorably influences satiety. This study examined the acute effect of peanut versus grain bar preloads on postmeal satiety and glycemia in healthy adults and the long-term effect of these meal preloads on body mass in healthy overweight adults. Methods In the acute crossover trial (n?=?15; 28.4?±?2.9 y; 23.1?±?0.9 kg/m2), the preload (isoenergetic peanut or grain bar with water, or water alone) was followed after 60 min with ingestion of a standardized glycemic test meal. Satiety and blood glucose were assessed immediately prior to the preload and to the test meal, and for two hours postmeal at 30-min intervals. In the parallel-arm, randomized trial (n?=?44; 40.5?±?1.6 y, 31.8?±?0.9 kg/m2), the peanut or grain bar preload was consumed one hour prior to the evening meal for eight weeks. Body mass was measured at 2-week intervals, and secondary endpoints included blood hemoglobin A1c and energy intake as assessed by 3-d diet records collected at pre-trial and trial weeks 1 and 8. Results Satiety was elevated in the postprandial period following grain bar ingestion in comparison to peanut or water ingestion (p?=?0.001, repeated-measures ANOVA). Blood glucose was elevated one hour after ingestion of the grain bar as compared to the peanut or water treatments; yet, total glycemia did not vary between treatments in the two hour postprandial period. In the 8-week trial, body mass was reduced for the grain bar versus peanut groups after eight weeks (?1.3?±?0.4 kg versus ?0.2?±?0.3 kg, p?=?0.033, analysis of covariance). Energy intake was reduced by 458 kcal/d in the first week of the trial for the grain bar group as compared to the peanut group (p?=?0.118). Hemoglobin A1c changed significantly between groups during the trial (?0.25?±?0.07% and ?0.18?±?0.12% for the grain bar and peanut groups respectively, p?=?0.001). Conclusions Compared to an isoenergetic peanut preload, consumption of a grain bar preload one hour prior to a standardized meal significantly raised postmeal satiety. Moreover, consumption of the grain bar prior to the evening meal was associated with significant weight loss over time suggesting that glycemic carbohydrate ingestion prior to meals may be a weight management strategy.
机译:背景花生的食用有利地影响饱腹感。这项研究检查了花生与谷物棒预紧力对健康成年人餐后饱腹感和血糖的急性影响,以及这些膳食预紧力对健康超重成年人体重的长期影响。方法在急性交叉试验(n = 15,28.4±2.9 y; 23.1±0.9 kg / m2)中,预紧力(等能量花生或谷物棒用水或单独用水)在60分钟后进行摄入标准化的血糖测试餐。在预紧负荷前和测试餐前以及餐后30分钟间隔两小时评估饱腹感和血糖。在平行臂随机试验中(n?=?44; 40.5?±?1.6 y,31.8?±?0.9 kg / m2),花生或谷物棒的预紧力在晚餐前一小时食用了八周。每隔2周测量一次体重,次要终点包括血红蛋白A1c和能量摄入,这是通过在审判前和试验第1和8周收集的3-d饮食记录进行评估的。结果谷物摄入后餐后饱腹感增强相较于花生或水摄入,摄入量为bar(p?=?0.001,重复测量方差分析)。与花生或水处理相比,摄入谷物棒一小时后血糖升高。然而,餐后两小时的不同治疗之间总血糖没有变化。在8周的试验中,谷物棒与花生组的体重在8周后降低了(?1.3?±?0.4 kg对?0.2?±?0.3 kg,p?=?0.033,协方差分析)。与花生组相比,谷物棒组在试验的第一周能量摄入减少了458 kcal / d。试验期间各组之间的血红蛋白A1c发生了显着变化(谷物棒和花生组的血红蛋白A1c分别为0.25%±0.07%和0.18%±0.12%,p = 0.001)。结论与等能量花生预负荷相比,在标准餐前一小时食用谷物棒预负荷可显着提高餐后饱腹感。此外,在晚餐前食用谷物棒会导致体重随着时间的流逝而显着减少,这表明在用餐前摄入糖类碳水化合物可能是一种体重管理策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号