...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Education Online >A comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students’ attitude toward interprofessional learning
【24h】

A comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students’ attitude toward interprofessional learning

机译:两种评估卫生专业学生对跨专业学习态度的量表的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

RationaleThe validated 19-item Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) is often used for assessing attitudes toward interprofessional education (IPE). The 12-item Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS), also used for this purpose, has not been validated among the professions of medicine, pharmacy, and physician assistants (PAs). The discriminatory ability of the two scales has not been directly compared. Comparison of the two will aid educators in selecting the optimal scale.ObjectiveTo compare psychometric properties of the RIPLS and IEPS and to examine the ability of each scale to discriminate mean scores among student subgroups (gender, profession, seniority, and prior IPE exposure).MethodWe conducted a cross-sectional (Qualtrics~(?)) survey (RIPLS and IEPS) of junior and senior students in medicine (n =360), pharmacy (n =360), and the PA profession (n =106). Descriptive statistics were used to report aggregate mean scores of subgroups. The internal consistency of each scale was assessed using Cronbach's α . Concurrent validity was measured by Pearson's correlation coefficients. Independent-sample t -tests and analysis of variances (ANOVAs) were performed to assess the discriminatory ability of each scale. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated for all significant pair-wise comparisons.ResultsResponse rate was 82%. Cronbach's α was 0.85 (RIPLS) and 0.91 (IEPS). The RIPLS discriminated scores by gender among junior students only, and scores by IPE exposure among all students. The IEPS distinguished score differences for the three professions among junior students and by prior IPE exposure for all three professions. Neither scale detected differences in mean scores by profession among all students or by level of training among the three professions.ConclusionsNeither the RIPLS nor the IEPS has greater discriminatory ability for detecting attitude differences among the student subgroups. Reason for differences may be explained by slightly different scale constructs. The RIPLS is designed to assess students’ own attitude toward interprofessional learning, while the IEPS discerns perceived attitudes about team collaboration for students’ own professions and may be more appropriate for more advanced students.
机译:基本原理经验证的19项职业间学习准备量表(RIPLS)通常用于评估对职业间教育(IPE)的态度。也用于此目的的12项跨学科教育感知量表(IEPS)在医学,药学和助理医师(PA)的专业中尚未得到验证。两种量表的区分能力尚未直接比较。两者的比较将有助于教育者选择最佳量表。目的比较RIPLS和IEPS的心理测量特性,并检验每种量表在学生亚组(性别,专业,资历和以前的IPE暴露)中区分平均得分的能力。方法我们对医学(n = 360),药学(n = 360)和PA专业()的初中和高年级学生进行了横断面(Qualtrics〜(?))调查(RIPLS和IEPS) n = 106)。描述性统计用于报告亚组的总平均得分。使用Cronbach'sα评估每个量表的内部一致性。并发有效性通过皮尔逊相关系数来衡量。进行独立样本t检验和方差分析(ANOVA),以评估每种量表的区分能力。计算了所有显着的成对比较的Cohen效应大小。结果响应率为82%。 Cronbach'sα为0.85(RIPLS)和0.91(IEPS)。 RIPLS仅按初中生按性别区分分数,而按所有学生按IPE暴露程度区分分数。 IEPS区分了这三个专业在初中生之间的分数差异,并通过对这三个专业的先前IPE暴露来区分。量表均未检测到所有学生的专业平均得分差异,也未检测到这三个专业之间的培训水平差异。结论RIPLS和IEPS都没有更大的辨别能力来检测学生亚组之间的态度差异。差异的原因可以通过规模结构略有不同来解释。 RIPLS旨在评估学生对跨专业学习的态度,而IEPS则针对学生自身的职业识别团队合作的态度,可能更适合高级学生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号