首页> 外文期刊>Espirales: Revista Multidisciplinaria de Investigaci贸n >Implementing backward design to improve students’ academic performance in EFL classes
【24h】

Implementing backward design to improve students’ academic performance in EFL classes

机译:实施向后设计以提高学生在EFL课堂上的学习成绩

获取原文
       

摘要

This study is based on implementing backward design to improve students’ academic assessment, so public high school students can take part of meaningful contexts where they show what they learned at the end of a class term. Taking in consideration, backward design is a great tool to be applied for public high schools where most of the classes are textbooks centered, provoking students’ frustration due to the lack of English knowledge from schools. There is a high rate of students failing courses because students are placed in English levels where they do not belong to or they come from other institutions where they did not learn English. Backward design lets teachers be creative and use skills and methodologies according to students’ needs and be very reflexive in the way of designing it. In this study, pairedT_Test is applied to compare scores from the same level, but using different ways of testing. In conclusion, the experimental group (G2), in which backward design was applied, got better results than the controlled group (G1), who did not apply it. In this case the independent variable which mean and scores are high. Results show backward design is very meaningful not only for students, but also for teachers. It is true that running appropriate action plans, selecting the best resources and conducting a final assessment through a performance task, gave the opportunity for students to gain more confidence on the language and apply it in a real context.
机译:这项研究基于实施向后设计以提高学生的学业评价,因此公立高中学生可以参与有意义的情境,在课堂学期末展示自己学到的知识。考虑到这一点,向后设计是适用于公立高中的一个很好的工具,在公立高中,大多数班级都以教科书为中心,由于缺乏英语知识,这使学生感到沮丧。学生失败的原因很严重,因为学生处于不属于他们的英语水平,或者来自其他未学习英语的机构来的学生。落后的设计使老师能够发挥创造力,并根据学生的需求使用技能和方法,并且在设计时会非常反身。在这项研究中,pairedT_Test用于比较同一级别但使用不同测试方式的分数。总之,采用落后设计的实验组(G2)比没有采用实验设计的对照组(G1)获得更好的结果。在这种情况下,均值和得分较高的自变量较高。结果表明,后向设计不仅对学生而且对教师都非常有意义。的确,运行适当的行动计划,选择最佳资源并通过绩效任务进行最终评估,使学生有机会获得对语言的更多信心并将其应用于实际环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号