首页> 外文期刊>Ecosphere >Inquiry‐based ecology laboratory courses improve student confidence and scientific reasoning skills
【24h】

Inquiry‐based ecology laboratory courses improve student confidence and scientific reasoning skills

机译:基于查询的生态实验室课程可提高学生的自信心和科学推理能力

获取原文
       

摘要

Recently, the AAAS Vision and Change report renewed the push to incorporate inquiry throughout the biology curriculum. Even prior to the report, many ecology faculty have used inquiry‐based approaches in their laboratory and field courses. However, the efficacy of these approaches has been assessed only to a limited degree and often at a single institution. Therefore, whether one may generalize the results of previous studies of inquiry‐based teaching in laboratory courses is unclear. We examined the change in student confidence and scientific reasoning skills using published, validated instruments in inquiry‐based ecology laboratory courses at two different institutions (a historically black, all‐male, liberal arts college and a private research university) across multiple semesters. Students exhibited a significant increase in overall confidence and scientific reasoning skills with students in the lowest quartile at the beginning of the semester for each construct exhibiting a significantly greater gain in comparison to students in the highest quartile for the same construct. Institution had no effect on learning gains, indicating that the positive impact of inquiry‐based learning is general, at least for students at our two institutions. Although weaker students exhibited greater learning gains, significant differences in confidence and scientific reasoning skills between the lowest and highest quartile persisted at the end of the semester; thus, a single, inquiry‐based laboratory course is not sufficient to overcome initial differences among students. Interestingly, gains in confidence were not significantly correlated with gains in scientific reasoning with some weaker students increasing in confidence while their scientific reasoning skills decreased, which suggests that our inquiry‐based laboratories did not help these students develop important metacognitive skills. Overall, our results indicate that inquiry‐based laboratory courses in ecology can lead to significant learning gains, but that performance gaps among students might only be bridged by students taking multiple inquiry‐based courses.
机译:最近,美国科学促进会(AAAS)的“视觉与变化”报告重新推动了将询问纳入整个生物学课程的努力。甚至在报告发布之前,许多生态系教师就在他们的实验室和实地课程中使用了基于查询的方法。但是,这些方法的有效性仅在有限的程度上被评估,并且通常是在单个机构中评估的。因此,目前尚不清楚是否可以将以前的探究式教学研究成果推广到实验室课程。我们在两个学期的两个不同机构(历史悠久的黑人,全男性,文理学院和私立研究型大学)的基于查询的生态实验室课程中,使用已发布的经过验证的手段,研究了学生信心和科学推理技能的变化。在每个学期开始时,最低四分位数的学生对每个结构的总体自信心和科学推理能力都有显着提高,而对于同一结构,最高四分位数的学生则表现出明显更大的收益。机构对学习成绩没有影响,表明基于探究性学习的积极影响是普遍的,至少对于我们两个机构的学生而言。尽管较弱的学生表现出更大的学习收获,但在学期末,最低和最高四分位数之间的自信心和科学推理技能仍存在显着差异;因此,基于查询的单一实验室课程不足以克服学生之间的初始差异。有趣的是,信心的获得与科学推理的获得并没有显着相关,一些较弱的学生在科学推理能力下降的同时信心增强了,这表明我们基于探究的实验室并没有帮助这些学生发展重要的元认知能力。总体而言,我们的结果表明,以探究为基础的生态学实验课程可以带来显着的学习成果,但学生之间的学习成绩差距可能只能通过修读多门基于探究的课程的学生来弥补。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号