首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Natural Science >The Comparative Double Blind Clinical Trial of Antihelmintic Efficacy Among Mebendazole, Thai Traditional Herbal Formulae and Areca catechu L.
【24h】

The Comparative Double Blind Clinical Trial of Antihelmintic Efficacy Among Mebendazole, Thai Traditional Herbal Formulae and Areca catechu L.

机译:甲苯咪唑,泰国传统草药配方和槟榔儿茶的驱虫效果比较双盲临床试验。

获取原文

摘要

This study was carried out in Mahasarakham Primary Healthcare Centre, Mahasarakham province in the area of Northeastern of Thailand. The experiment was randomized control trial clinical comparative study in order to examine the antihelmintic activity efficacy among Mebendazole, Thai Traditional Formulae, Areca catechu Linn. in the treatment of 200 mixed worms infection in human. The experimental group consisted of 150 patients and 50 patients for control group with inclusion and exclusion criteria which were screened by the selected mix worm infected patients samples. The investigation and extraction of worm eggs per gram of patient feces method (EPG) were performed with Ether Formalin Sedimentation test. The percentage of reduction of eggs per gram (EPG) of patient feces were collected, counted and confirmed by parasitologist and the clinical efficacy were investigated by the physician and the pharmacist. The % EPG data were collected before and after the treatment with Mebendazole, Thai Traditional Formulae, Areca catechu Linn. and with placebo. The result showed that Thai Traditional Formulae had the highest efficacy in antihelmintic activity followed by the efficacy of Mebendazole and Areca catechu Linn. respectively. The antihelmintic efficacy which were measured by the % reduction of egg worm per gram of patient feces were 93.69, 87.50, 68.12 respectively. The statistical analysis confirmation in this study were carried out by Wilcoxson Signed Ranks test and Kruskal Wallis method. The suggestion of this study should increase the number of samples of worm infected patients which the samples can be identified with more specific helminthes genus and species in order to obtain various types of efficacy by the treatment of different medicine as mentioned above.
机译:这项研究是在泰国东北部地区Mahasarakham省Mahasarakham初级保健中心进行的。为了检验甲苯咪唑,泰国传统配方,槟榔槟榔之间的抗蠕虫活性功效,本实验是随机对照试验临床比较研究。在治疗200例人类混合蠕虫感染中。实验组由150名患者和50名对照组患者组成,具有入选和排除标准,并通过选择的混合蠕虫感染患者样本进行筛选。每克病人粪便中蠕虫卵的提取和提取方法(EPG)均采用乙醚福尔马林沉淀试验进行。寄生虫学家收集,计数和确认每克患者粪便中鸡蛋减少的百分比(EPG),并由医师和药剂师研究临床疗效。在用甲苯咪唑,泰国传统配方,槟榔儿茶处理之前和之后收集%EPG数据。和安慰剂。结果表明,泰国传统配方的抗蠕虫活性最高,其次是甲苯达唑和槟榔儿茶。分别。通过每克患者粪便中的蠕虫减少百分比测得的抗蠕虫药功效分别为93.69、87.50、68.12。本研究中的统计分析证实是通过Wilcoxson Signed Ranks检验和Kruskal Wallis方法进行的。这项研究的建议应该增加蠕虫感染患者的样本数量,这些样本可以用更具体的蠕虫属和种类进行鉴定,以便通过上述不同药物的治疗获得各种类型的功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号