首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Population Data Science >Coding Agreement on Identification of Main Resource Use Using ICD-10 and ICD-11
【24h】

Coding Agreement on Identification of Main Resource Use Using ICD-10 and ICD-11

机译:关于使用ICD-10和ICD-11识别主要资源使用的编码协议

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionMain condition coding definitions in the International Classification of Disease (ICD) 10th and 11th versions are broadly defined in the current and upcoming versions of ICD, and coding health data can involve subjective coding specialist interpretation. Inconsistent coding can lead to inaccurate reporting, and lower quality data for research use. Objectives and ApproachMain condition coding agreement was compared between ICD-10 and ICD-11. 730 hospital charts were randomly selected from Foothills Medical Centre in Calgary, Alberta. These charts were previously coded using ICD-10, and six professional coding specialists recoded them using ICD-11. To compare frequencies of ICD-10 to ICD-11, we used current WHO crosswalk tables to match codes. For any missing codes, manual comparison by done by a qualified reviewer. In Canada, the “main condition” is the clinically significant reason for the hospital visit. If multiple problems were present, the diagnosis using the greatest amount of resources is coded, “main resource use”. ResultsOverall, 730 ICD-10 coded charts were analyzed. Of these charts, 79% (577) had matching resource coding between ICD-10 and ICD-11, and 21% (153) had mismatching coding. Matching coding was either considered an exact match between definitions (23.2%, 134), or similar but not identical (often one code has greater detail, 76.8%, 443). Mismatching codes were either due to different codes for similar conditions (13.1%, 20), different codes for not similar but related conditions (43.8%, 67), or completely different codes for unrelated conditions (43.1%, 66). Conclusion/ImplicationsICD-10 and ICD-11 main resource codes had a high match frequency indicating consistency between coding practices and ICD definitions (577/730, 79%). Future research will aim to understand underlying causes of mismatched main resource use codes. This research will help us understand issues in coding and contribute to future ICD-11 revisions.
机译:简介在国际疾病分类(ICD)的第10版和第11版中,主要条件编码定义在ICD的当前版本和即将发布的版本中得到了广泛定义,并且编码健康数据可能涉及主观编码专家的解释。编码不一致会导致报告不准确,并且会降低研究数据的质量。目的和方法比较了ICD-10和ICD-11的主要条件编码协议。从艾伯塔省卡尔加里的山麓医学中心随机选择了730张病历。这些图表以前是使用ICD-10编码的,六位专业编码专家使用ICD-11对其进行了编码。为了比较ICD-10和ICD-11的频率,我们使用了当前的WHO人行横道表来匹配代码。对于任何缺少的代码,请由合格的审阅者进行手动比较。在加拿大,“主要疾病”是医院就诊的临床重要原因。如果存在多个问题,则将使用最多资源的诊断编码为“主要资源使用”。结果分析了730张ICD-10编码图表。在这些图表中,有79%(577)具有ICD-10和ICD-11之间的匹配资源编码,而21%(153)具有不匹配的编码。匹配编码要么被认为是定义之间的精确匹配(23.2%,134),要么是相似但不完全相同(通常,一个代码具有更详细的信息,分别为76.8%,443)。代码不匹配是由于相似条件下的不同代码(13.1%,20),不相似但相关条件下的不同代码(43.8%,67)或不相关条件的完全不同的代码(43.1%,66)所致。结论/含义ICD-10和ICD-11主要资源代码的匹配频率很高,表明编码实践与ICD定义之间具有一致性(577/730,79%)。未来的研究将旨在了解主要资源使用代码不匹配的根本原因。这项研究将帮助我们理解编码问题,并为将来的ICD-11修订做出贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号