首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research >Small group discussion: Students perspectives
【24h】

Small group discussion: Students perspectives

机译:小组讨论:学生观点

获取原文
           

摘要

Context:Various alternative methods are being used in many medical colleges to reinforce didactic lectures in physiology. Small group teaching can take on a variety of different tasks such as problem-solving, role play, discussions, brainstorming, and debate. Research has demonstrated that group discussion promotes greater synthesis and retention of materials.Aims:The aims of this study were to adopt a problem-solving approach by relating basic sciences with the clinical scenario through self-learning. To develop soft skills, to understand principles of group dynamics, and adopt a new teaching learning methodology.Subjects and Methods:Experimental study design was conducted in Phase I 1st year medical students of 2014–2015 batch (n = 120). On the day of the session, the students were grouped into small groups (15 each). The session started with the facilitator starting off the discussion. Feedback forms from five students in each group was taken (n = 40). A five point Likert scale was used ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Results:Our results show that 70% of the students opined that small group discussion were interactive, friendly, innovative, built interaction between teacher and student. Small group discussion increased their thought process and helped them in better communication.Conclusions:The small group discussion was interactive, friendly, and bridged the gap between the teacher and student. The student's communication skills are also improved. In conclusion, small group discussion is more effective than the traditional teaching methods.
机译:背景:许多医学院使用各种替代方法来加强生理学方面的教学。小组教学可以承担各种不同的任务,例如解决问题,角色扮演,讨论,集思广益和辩论。研究表明,小组讨论可以促进材料的合成和保留。目的:本研究的目的是通过自学将基础科学与临床研究联系起来,从而采用解决问题的方法。要开发软技能,了解小组动力的原理,并采用新的教学学习方法。研究对象和方法:实验研究设计是在2014-2015年批次的第一年级医学生中进行的(n = 120)。在课程的当天,学生们被分成小组(每组15人)。会议从主持人开始讨论开始。取每组五名学生的反馈表(n = 40)。使用五点李克特量表,范围从完全同意到完全不同意。使用IBM SPSS Statistics Windows版,版本21.0对数据进行了分析。结果:我们的结果表明,有70%的学生认为小组讨论是师生之间的互动,友好,创新,建立的互动。小组讨论增加了他们的思考过程,并帮助他们进行了更好的沟通。结论:小组讨论是互动的,友好的,弥合了师生之间的鸿沟。学生的沟通能力也得到提高。总之,小组讨论比传统的教学方法更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号