首页> 外文期刊>Asian spine journal. >Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Single-Level PLIF: Comparison between Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis, Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis
【24h】

Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Single-Level PLIF: Comparison between Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis, Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis

机译:单级PLIF后相邻节段退变:椎体滑脱性椎体滑脱,退行性椎体滑脱和脊柱狭窄之间的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Design A retrospective study. Purpose To comparatively investigated the rate of the adjacent segment degeneration and the clinical outcomes in patients with spondylolytic spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis or degenerative spondylolisthesis. Overview of Literature There have been few studies reported on the adjacent segment degeneration following posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF). Many risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration following PLIF have been proposed. The range of decompression has been presented as one of the risk factors, yet controversial. Methods This study enrolled sixty-three patients who had been treated with single-level PLIF and who were followed up for more than two years. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the preoperative diagnosis. We analyzed the difference between the preoperative and postoperative intervertebral disc heights of the superior adjacent segments. The incidence rates of instability and the clinical outcomes were comparatively analyzed between each group. Results The average age of the patients was 55.8 years in the spondylolytic spondylolisthesis group, 65.9 years in the degenerative spondylolisthesis group and 60.4 years in the spinal stenosis group. The average follow-up period was 44 months, 43 months and 42 months, respectively. At the last follow-up, compared to the preoperative period, the intervertebral disc height decreased in all three groups. A statistically significant decrease ( p 0.01) was observed only in the spondylolytic spondylolisthesis group and no significant difference was observed between each group ( p = 0.41). The incidence rate of instability and the clinical outcome were not significantly different between each group. Conclusions Spondylolytic spondylolisthesis with total laminectomy and single-level PLIF showed no significant difference in the superior adjacent segment degeneration and instability, and the clinical outcome as compared to that of partial laminectomy with single-level PLIF for treating degenerative spondylolisthesis or spinal stenosis.
机译:研究设计回顾性研究。目的比较研究椎体溶解性脊柱滑脱,脊柱狭窄或退行性脊柱滑脱的患者相邻节段变性的发生率和临床结局。文献综述很少有研究报道后路腰椎椎间融合术后邻近节段变性。已经提出了PLIF后邻近节段变性的许多危险因素。减压范围已被认为是危险因素之一,但存在争议。方法:该研究招募了63例接受单水平PLIF治疗并随访了两年以上的患者。根据术前诊断将患者分为3组。我们分析了上相邻节段的椎间盘高度在术前和术后的差异。每组之间的不稳定性发生率和临床结果进行了比较分析。结果椎体溶解性腰椎滑脱组患者的平均年龄为55.8岁,变性型椎体滑脱组的平均年龄为65.9岁,脊椎狭窄组的平均年龄为60.4岁。平均随访时间分别为44个月,43个月和42个月。在最后一次随访中,与术前相比,三组椎间盘高度均下降。仅在自溶性腰椎滑脱组中观察到统计学上的显着降低(p <0.01),而各组之间未观察到显着差异(p = 0.41)。两组之间的不稳定性发生率和临床结局无显着差异。结论全椎板切除联合单层PLIF椎体滑脱椎体滑脱术在上节段变性和不稳定性方面无显着差异,与单层PLIF局部椎板切除术治疗退行性脊椎滑脱或椎管狭窄相比,临床疗效无显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号