首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Microdecompression and uninstrumented single-level fusion for spinal canal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
【24h】

Microdecompression and uninstrumented single-level fusion for spinal canal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

机译:微减压和非器械单级融合治疗退行性脊柱滑脱椎管狭窄。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was completed on 21 patients who had a "least invasive" (one or two level) microdecompression and uninstrumented single-segment lumbar fusion for spinal canal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a "least invasive" approach to lumbar spinal canal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis would yield acceptable results. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The prevailing surgical technique for symptomatic spinal canal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis is a wide midline decompression and instrumented fusion. METHODS: On an average of 38 months postoperatively, 21 patients were personally assessed on four scores: 1) their overall satisfaction with the outcome of surgery, 2) an analog back and leg pain scale, 3) a functional evaluation scale, and 4) Ferguson (upshot) anterior-posterior lumbosacral and lateral flexion-extension radiographs. RESULTS: The overall satisfactory outcome on all four scales was 16 (76%) of 21. Twenty of twenty-one patients had relief of their claudicant leg pain; the overall fusion rate was 18 (86%) of 21. Two of three patients with a pseudarthrosis had a successful outcome on the patient-oriented outcome (1, 2, and 3) scales (excluding the radiograph scale), and one was a failure. One patient with a solid fusion was a failure because of continuing back pain. One patient with a solid fusion was a failure because of continuing leg pain. The overall satisfactory outcome on the nonradiographic scales was 18 of 21, for an 86% patient satisfaction rate. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, a "least invasive" surgical approach to lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal canal stenosis causing claudicant leg pain produced acceptable results.
机译:研究设计:回顾性研究完成了21例“微创”(一或两个水平)微减压和非器械性单节段腰椎融合治疗伴有退行性腰椎滑脱的椎管狭窄患者。目的:确定腰椎管狭窄和退行性腰椎滑脱的“微创”治疗方法是否会产生可接受的结果。背景资料概述:伴有退行性腰椎滑脱的症状性椎管狭窄的流行手术技术是广泛的中线减压和器械融合。方法:平均术后38个月,对21例患者进行了四个评分的个人评估:1)对手术结果的总体满意度,2)背部和腿部疼痛模拟量表,3)功能评估量表和4)弗格森(上摄)腰s腰部和外侧屈伸影像学检查。结果:在所有四个量表上的总体满意结果均是21例中的16例(占76%)。总融合率为21的18(86%)。假关节的三名患者中有两名在以患者为导向的结果(1、2和3)量表(不包括X光片)上取得了成功的结果,失败。一名进行固体融合的患者因持续腰痛而失败。由于持续的腿部疼痛,一位进行固体融合的患者失败了。在非放射线量表上,总体满意结果为21分中的18分,患者满意度为86%。结论:在这项回顾性研究中,一种“微创”手术方法治疗腰椎退行性脊柱滑脱伴椎管狭窄引起腿部aud直性疼痛,取得了可接受的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号