首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development >The Effect of Logical Choice Weight and Corrected Scoring Methods on Multiple Choice Agricultural Science Test Scores
【24h】

The Effect of Logical Choice Weight and Corrected Scoring Methods on Multiple Choice Agricultural Science Test Scores

机译:逻辑选择权重和正确的计分方法对多项选择农业科学测试成绩的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The study focused on the effect of logical choice  weight and corrected scoring methods on multiple choice Agricultural science test scores the study also investigated the interaction effect of logical choice weight and corrected scoring methods in schools ,and  types of school in multiple choice agricultural science test. The researcher used a combination of survey type and one short experimental design. The sample for the study consisted of 600 students selected by stratified random sampling techniques in south western Nigeria. Overall performance of students in percentage, and correlation was analyzed. The hypotheses were generated and tested at 0.05 level of significance. The study revealed that there was a significant difference in the academic performance of students in logical choice weight and corrected scoring methods in multiple choice agricultural science test scores. The result also shown that there was no interaction effect on the two scoring methods in the type of schools, the location of schools in multiple choices agricultural science test. The study revealed that logical choice weight scoring method was the best method that favoured the scoring of the students? scripts in multiple choices agricultural science test. On the basis of these findings, logical choice weight should be introduced to the teachers to use in the classroom as a new method of scoring multiple choice agricultural science the logical choice weight method is recommended in the ministry of education, in Examination Division, and to junior secondary schools for scoring JSS (3) three multiple choice test. Examination bodies such as West Africa Examination Council (WAEC), National Examination Council (NECO), Joint Admission and Matriculation Board (JAMB) should adopt the use of logical choice weight method in scoring multiple choice tests. The method could be used in tertiary institutions for post ?JAMB? Unify Matriculation Examination (UME) test. It is also recommended for all states of the federation as well the West African countries public service could also adopt the use of logical choice weight scoring method.
机译:该研究侧重于逻辑选择权重和纠正的计分方法对多项选择农业科学测验成绩的影响,研究还研究了逻辑选择权重和纠正的计分方法在学校和学校类型中在多项选择农业科学测验中的相互作用。研究人员结合了调查类型和一个简短的实验设计。该研究的样本由尼日利亚西南部的600名通过分层随机抽样技术选出的学生组成。分析了学生的整体表现百分比和相关性。产生假设并以0.05的显着性水平进行检验。研究表明,在多项选择农业科学测验分数中,学生在逻辑选择权重和校正计分方法上的学业成绩存在显着差异。结果还表明,在学校类型,选择农业科学测验中学校的位置上,两种评分方法没有交互作用。研究表明,逻辑选择权重计分法是偏爱学生计分的最佳方法?多种选择农业科学测试中的脚本。根据这些发现,应该向教师介绍逻辑选择权重,作为在课堂上对多项选择农业科学进行评分的一种新方法。在教育部,考试科中,建议采用逻辑选择权重法。初中JSS评分(3)三种选择题测验。西非考试委员会(WAEC),国家考试委员会(NECO),联合招生和入学委员会(JAMB)等考试机构应在选择题评分中采用逻辑选择权重法。该方法可用于大专院校的“ JAMB”岗位。统一入学考试(UME)测试。还建议该联盟的所有州以及西非国家/地区的公共服务机构也可以采用逻辑选择权重计分方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号