首页> 外文期刊>Advances in physiology education >A progressive assessment strategy improves student learning and perceived course quality in undergraduate physiology
【24h】

A progressive assessment strategy improves student learning and perceived course quality in undergraduate physiology

机译:循序渐进的评估策略可提高学生的学习能力,并提高他们在生理学上的认知

获取原文
           

摘要

In 2010, second-year physiology (n = 165) had a traditional single 3-h end-of-semester exam. To provide diagnostic feedback earlier, for students enrolled in 2011 (n = 128), we incorporated an in-class exam at 3 wk in addition to the final exam. Based on initial analysis and positive student comments, for the 2012 cohort (n = 148), we expanded this to incorporate four 1-h in-class exams every 3 wk plus a short final integrative exam. Average scores from exams and questionnaires (student evaluations of learning and teaching, 10 questions) were compared among 2010, 2011, and 2012 cohorts. We also compared scores in the practical component of the course, which had a constant format for all cohorts. Data are given as means ± SD; statistical analyses were done with unpaired two-way Students t-tests. From 2010 to 2012, there was a significant improvement in total exam scores (59.7 ± 15.8 vs. 68.6 ± 14.2, P < 0.001) but no significant change in total practical scores (72.3 ± 9.0 vs. 74.4 ± 10.2, P = 0.05), indicating that the rise in exam score was not due to higher academic abilities of the 2012 cohort. Overall mean student evaluation of learning and teaching responses (4.9 ± 0.4 vs. 5.3 ± 0.3, P = 0.015) and overall percent broad agreement (66.0 ± 8.0 vs. 79.2 ± 7.5, P = 0.003) indicated a significant improvement in student satisfaction. In conclusion, both learning outcome and perceived course quality were enhanced by the increased frequency of examinations, possibly by promoting consistent student study habits.
机译:在2010年,二年级生理学(n = 165)进行了传统的单项3小时学期末考试。为了提供更早的诊断反馈,对于2011年入学的学生(n = 128),除期末考试外,我们还于每周3周进行了一次课堂内考试。根据初步分析和学生的正面评价,对于2012年同期的队列(n = 148),我们将其扩展为每3周加入四次1-h课堂内考试以及简短的期末综合考试。在2010年,2011年和2012年的队列中比较了考试和问卷调查的平均分数(学生的学与教评价,共10个问题)。我们还比较了该课程实际部分中的分数,该分数在所有同类群组中均采用固定格式。数据以平均值±标准差给出;使用不成对的双向学生t检验进行统计分析。从2010年到2012年,总考试成绩有显着提高(59.7±15.8比68.6±14.2,P <0.001),但实际总成绩没有显着变化(72.3±9.0 vs. 74.4±10.2,P = 0.05) ,表明考试成绩的提高并不是由于2012年队列的学术能力提高。学生对学习和教学反应的总体平均评估(4.9±0.4 vs. 5.3±0.3,P = 0.015)和总体广泛同意百分率(66.0±8.0 vs. 79.2±7.5,P = 0.003)表明学生满意度有了显着提高。总而言之,考试频率的增加(可能是通过养成一致的学生学习习惯)可提高学习成果和感知课程质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号