首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>CBE Life Sciences Education >Articulating Scientific Reasoning Improves Student Learning in an Undergraduate Anatomy and Physiology Course
【2h】

Articulating Scientific Reasoning Improves Student Learning in an Undergraduate Anatomy and Physiology Course

机译:阐明科学推理可改善本科解剖生理学课程的学生学习

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In many life science classrooms, instructors rely upon lecture presentations to efficiently present course content. Students, in this case, act as passive learners with little opportunity to test their knowledge for gaps or misconceptions. The goal of the project described here was to determine whether a collaborative quiz protocol that guided students to discuss their understanding with their peers would improve learning and academic performance. The project took place during a single semester and was composed of two studies: a preliminary study that incorporated short-answer quizzes into the curriculum and a comprehensive study that incorporated short-answer quizzes and justify/explain quizzes in which students were expected to select an answer and then justify or explain it. Students took all quizzes twice, first independently and then collaboratively with classmate(s). Learning was assessed using multiple-choice exam questions based upon quiz topics. Students scored significantly higher on exam questions associated with justify/explain quiz topics than on those associated with short-answer quiz topics.
机译:在许多生命科学教室中,讲师依靠讲座演示来有效地介绍课程内容。在这种情况下,学生充当被动学习者,几乎没有机会测试他们的知识是否存在差距或误解。这里描述的项目的目的是确定指导学生与同龄人讨论他们的理解的协作测验协议是否会改善学习和学习成绩。该项目在一个学期内进行,由两项研究组成:一项将短期答案测验纳入课程的初步研究;一项将短期答案测验与合理/解释性测验结合在一起的综合研究,希望学生选择其中的一项。回答然后证明或解释它。学生两次参加所有测验,首先独立进行,然后与同学合作。使用基于测验主题的多项选择题对学习进行评估。与辩解/解释测验主题相关的考试问题的学生分数远比与短答案测验主题相关的学生的分数高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号