...
首页> 外文期刊>CyTA Journal of Food >Comparative study of the effects of fermented and non-fermented chickpea flour addition on quality and antioxidant properties of wheat bread
【24h】

Comparative study of the effects of fermented and non-fermented chickpea flour addition on quality and antioxidant properties of wheat bread

机译:发酵和非发酵鹰嘴豆粉添加对小麦面包品质和抗氧化性能影响的比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ABSTRACT The main aim of the present study was to compare the effects of Cordyceps militaris -fermented chickpea (CFC) and non-fermented chickpea (NFC) flour addition on quality (including proximate composition, specific volume, crust and crumb colour, molecular mobility, crumb texture, sensory evaluation) and antioxidant properties of wheat bread, and also compare with these properties on the wheat-only bread. The wheat flour was partially substituted by NFC and CFC at a level of 50????g/Kg flour basis, respectively. Addition of chickpea flour (both CFC and NFC) to wheat bread showed higher protein, fat content, yellowness index values as well as enhanced the phenolics content and antioxidant activity whereas lower lightness values were observed, and CFC?¢????wheat bread showed higher phenolics and antioxidant activity than NFC?¢????wheat bread. Furthermore, bread incorporated with CFC exhibited higher specific volume and lower crumb hardness than the wheat-only bread but addition of NFC resulted in a negative effect on specific volume and crumb firmness. Sensory evaluations revealed that breads substituted with CFC got the highest scores in terms of appearance, texture, colour and overall acceptance. Results suggested that bread fortified with CFC improved quality (specific volume, texture, colour, sensory) and antioxidant properties, and thus was consider of great potential in the production of high consumer acceptable as well as quality and antioxidant properties improved bread. Abbreviations : NFC: non-fermented chickpeas; CFC: Cordyceps militaris -fermented chickpeas; TCD*: total colour difference; LF-NMR: low field nuclear magnetic resonance; DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS: 2,2-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) diammonium sa TPC: total phenolics content; Vitamin C, ascorbic acid.
机译:摘要本研究的主要目的是比较addition虫草发酵鹰嘴豆(CFC)和非发酵鹰嘴豆(NFC)面粉添加对质量(包括邻近成分,比容,地壳和面包屑颜色,分子迁移率,面包屑的质感,感官评价)和抗氧化性能,并与纯麦面包的这些性能进行比较。小麦粉分别被NFC和CFC部分取代,其含量为50-6克/千克面粉。在小麦面包中添加鹰嘴豆粉(CFC和NFC)均显示出较高的蛋白质,脂肪含量,黄度指数值,并提高了酚类含量和抗氧化活性,而观察到的白度值较低,因此CFC –小麦面包较酚类面包具有更高的酚类和抗氧化活性。此外,掺入CFC的面包比纯麦面包具有更高的比容和更低的面包屑硬度,但是添加NFC会对比容和面包屑硬度产生负面影响。感官评估表明,用CFC代替的面包在外观,质地,颜色和总体接受度方面得分最高。结果表明,用CFC强化的面包改善了质量(比容,质地,颜色,感官)和抗氧化性能,因此被认为在生产高消费者认可的面包以及质量和抗氧化性能改善的面包中具有巨大的潜力。缩写:NFC:非发酵鹰嘴豆; CFC:mil虫草发酵鹰嘴豆; TCD *:总色差; LF-NMR:低场核磁共振; DPPH:2,2-二苯基-1-吡啶并肼基; ABTS:2,2-氮杂双(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)二铵盐; TPC:总酚含量;维生素C,抗坏血酸。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号