首页> 外文期刊>Cogent Education >Recasts vs. direct corrective feedback on writing performance of high school EFL learners
【24h】

Recasts vs. direct corrective feedback on writing performance of high school EFL learners

机译:重铸与对高中EFL学习者写作表现的直接纠正反馈

获取原文
           

摘要

There might always be errors during the learning process which need correction; accordingly, providing corrective feedback is critical. However, the various types of feedback applied during classes affect the learning and teaching process. Teaching and learning could be applied within EFL classes by providing learners with recasts. Recasts have been provided frequently in both first language acquisition and second language acquisition. Extensive studies have indicated that recasts are the most frequent feedback type in speaking, yet this study investigates their efficacy on writing. Forty high school EFL learners participated in this study for 20 sessions within a period of 3?months. The participants were divided into two experimental groups and were provided with two types of feedback. While participants of one group received recasts as a type of indirect feedback, participants of other group received direct corrective feedback. Results obtained by a pretest and a posttest indicated that both groups made significant progress in their writing performance, yet there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on the posttest. The recast group achieved higher scores, performing better than the direct correction group.
机译:在学习过程中可能总是存在需要纠正的错误;因此,提供纠正反馈至关重要。但是,在课堂上应用的各种类型的反馈会影响学习和教学过程。通过向学习者提供重播,可以在EFL班级中应用教学。在第一语言习得和第二语言习得中都经常提供重铸。广泛的研究表明,重铸是语音中最常见的反馈类型,但该研究调查了其在写作中的功效。 40名高中EFL学习者在3个月内参加了这项研究,共进行了20堂课。参与者分为两个实验组,并获得两种类型的反馈。一组参与者收到的重铸是一种间接反馈,而另一组参与者则收到了直接的纠正反馈。通过预测试和后测试获得的结果表明,两组在写作表现上都取得了显着进步,但两组在后测试上有统计学上的显着差异。重铸组得分较高,表现优于直接矫正组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号