...
首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >C-QUALITY: cost and quality-of-life pharmacoeconomic analysis of antidepressants used in major depressive disorder in the regional Italian settings of Veneto and Sardinia
【24h】

C-QUALITY: cost and quality-of-life pharmacoeconomic analysis of antidepressants used in major depressive disorder in the regional Italian settings of Veneto and Sardinia

机译:C-QUALITY:在意大利威尼托和撒丁岛地区主要抑郁症患者中使用的抗抑郁药的成本和生活质量药物经济学分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Major depression is a commonly occurring, seriously impairing, and often recurrent mental disorder. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are the treatments most commonly used for major depressive disorder. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of SSRIs and SNRIs in the treatment of major depressive disorder in two Italian regional settings, ie, Veneto and Sardinia. Methods: A decision analytic model was adapted from the Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency to reflect current clinical practice in the treatment of major depressive disorder in the most significant Italian regions. This adaptation was possible as a result of collaboration with an expert panel of Italian psychiatrists and health economists. The population comprised patients with a first diagnosis of major depressive disorder and initiating one SSRI or SNRI drug for the first time. The time frame used was 12 months. Efficacy and utility data for the model were retrieved from the literature and validated by the expert panel. Local data were used for resource utilization and for treatment costs based on the perspective of each regional health service. Scenario analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model. Results: Base case analysis showed that escitalopram is associated with the largest health gain (in quality-adjusted life years) and a lower total cost at one year for Sardinia (except for sertraline, against which it was cost-effective) and for Veneto, and therefore dominates the other treatment strategies, given that more quality-adjusted life years are achieved at a lower total cost. Scenario analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses support the robustness of the model. Conclusion: The results indicate that escitalopram is the most cost-effective pharmacologic treatment strategy for both regional health services compared with all SSRIs and all SNRIs used in the first-line treatment of major depressive disorder.
机译:背景:重度抑郁症是一种常见的严重受损的精神疾病,经常复发。选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和5-羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)是最常用于重度抑郁症的治疗方法。这项研究的目的是评估在意大利两个地区,即威尼托和撒丁岛,SSRI和SNRI在治疗重度抑郁症中的成本效益。方法:采用瑞典牙科和药物福利局的决策分析模型,以反映当前在意大利最重要地区治疗重度抑郁症的临床实践。通过与意大利精神科医生和卫生经济学家的专家小组合作,这种适应成为可能。该人群包括首次诊断为重度抑郁症并首次开始使用SSRI或SNRI药物的患者。使用的时间范围是12个月。从文献中检索该模型的功效和效用数据,并通过专家小组进行验证。基于每个区域卫生服务的观点,将本地数据用于资源利用和治疗费用。进行了情景分析和概率敏感性分析,以测试模型的鲁棒性。结果:基本病例分析表明,依地普仑与撒丁岛(舍曲林除外,具成本效益)和威尼托的最大健康收益(按质量调整的生命年)和一年的总成本较低有关,并以较低的总成本实现了更多的质量调整寿命,从而主导了其他治疗策略。方案分析和概率敏感性分析支持模型的鲁棒性。结论:结果表明,与用于主要抑郁症一线治疗的所有SSRI和所有SNRI相比,依他普仑是区域卫生服务中最具成本效益的药物治疗策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号