...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs following first-line antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: a retrospective US claims database analysis
【24h】

Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs following first-line antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: a retrospective US claims database analysis

机译:抑郁症的一线抗抑郁治疗后的治疗方式,医疗保健资源利用和费用:美国一项回顾性索赔数据库分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Although the symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) are often manageable with pharmacotherapy, response to first-line antidepressant treatment is often less than optimal. This study describes long-term treatment patterns in MDD patients in the United States and quantifies the economic burden associated with different treatment patterns following first-line antidepressant therapy. Methods MDD patients starting first-line antidepressant monotherapy and having continuous enrollment ≥12?months before and ≥24?months following the index date (i.e., the first documented prescription fill) were selected from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan (2003–2014) database. Based on the type of first treatment change following initiation, six treatment cohorts were defined a priori (“ persistence ”; “ discontinuation ”; “ switch ”; “ dose escalation ”; “ augmentation ”; and “ combination ”). Treatment patterns through the fourth line of therapy within each cohort, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and cost analyses were restricted to patients with adequate treatment duration (defined as ≥42?days) in each line (analysis sub-sample, N =?21,088). HCRU and costs were described at the cohort and pattern levels. Treatment cohorts representing Results 39,557 patients were included. Mean age was 42.1?years, 61.1% of patients were female, and mean follow-up was 4.1?years. Among the analysis sub-sample, the discontinuation (49.1%), dose escalation (37.4%), and switch (6.6%) cohorts were the most common of all treatment cohorts. First-line antidepressant discontinuation without subsequent MDD pharmacotherapy (22.9%) and cycling between discontinuation and resumption (11.2%) were the two most common treatment patterns. Median time to discontinuation was 23?weeks. The switch cohort exhibited the highest HCRU (18.9?days with medical visits per-patient-per-year) and greatest healthcare costs ($11,107 per-patient-per-year) following the index date. Treatment patterns representing a cycling on and off treatment in the switch cohort were associated with the greatest healthcare costs overall. Conclusion A high proportion of patients discontinue first-line antidepressant shortly after initiation. Patterns representing a cycling on and off treatment in the switch cohort were associated with the highest healthcare costs. These findings underscore challenges in effectively treating patients with MDD and a need for personalized patient management.
机译:背景技术虽然重度抑郁症(MDD)的症状通常可以通过药物治疗来解决,但对一线抗抑郁药的治疗反应往往并非最佳。这项研究描述了美国MDD患者的长期治疗方式,并量化了一线抗抑郁治疗后与不同治疗方式相关的经济负担。方法从Truven Health Analytics MarketScan(2003-2014)数据库中选择开始一线抗抑郁单一疗法并在索引日期之前连续≥12个月且在索引日期后≥24个月(即首次记录的处方药)的MDD患者。根据开始后首次治疗改变的类型,先后定义了六个治疗队列(“持续性”,“停药”,“转换”,“剂量递增”,“增强”和“组合”)。每个队列中通过第四线治疗的治疗方式,医疗资源利用(HCRU)和成本分析仅限于每线中具有足够治疗持续时间(定义为≥42天)的患者(分析子样本,N =? 21,088)。 HCRU和成本在队列和模式级别进行了描述。代表结果的治疗队列39,557名患者。平均年龄为42.1岁,女性为61.1%,平均随访时间为4.1岁。在分析子样本中,停药(49.1%),剂量递增(37.4%)和转换(6.6%)队列是所有治疗队列中最常见的队列。一线抗抑郁药停药后不进行随后的MDD药物治疗(22.9%),以及停药和恢复之间的循环(11.2%)是两种最常见的治疗方式。停药的中位时间为23周。在索引日期之后,转换队列显示出最高的HCRU(18.9天,每位患者/每年的医疗访问量)和最大的医疗保健费用(每位患者/每年11,107美元)。总体而言,代表转换队列中的循环开关治疗的治疗模式与最大的医疗保健费用相关。结论很大一部分患者在开始后不久就停用一线抗抑郁药。代表转换队列中的循环通断治疗的模式与最高的医疗保健成本相关。这些发现强调了有效治疗MDD患者的挑战以及对个性化患者管理的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号