...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in therapy. >C-QUALITY: Cost and quality-of-life pharmacoeconomic analysis of antidepressants in major depressive disorder in italy
【24h】

C-QUALITY: Cost and quality-of-life pharmacoeconomic analysis of antidepressants in major depressive disorder in italy

机译:C质量:意大利重大抑郁症抗抑郁药的成本和生活质量药物分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and disabling condition across the world. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are the most commonly used antidepressants. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness [? per quality-adjusted life year (QALY)] of all SSRIs and all SNRIs for the treatment of MDD in Italy. Methods: A decision analytic model was adapted from the Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits agency model to reflect current clinical practice in the treatment of MDD in the largest Italian regions. This adaptation was possible thanks to the collaboration of an expert panel of Italian psychiatrists and health economists. The model evaluated patients with a first diagnosis of MDD and initiating an SSRI or an SNRI for the first time. The time horizon was 12 months. Efficacy and utility data for the model were retrieved from the literature and validated by the expert panel. Local data were considered for resource utilization and for treatment costs based on each regional health service perspective. Population-weighted regional data were used to define a national model. Scenario simulations, one-way sensitivity analyses, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to test the robustness of the model. Results: The base case analysis showed that escitalopram was associated with a lower total cost (? 1,562) and a larger health gain (QALYs) at 1 year (0.732) per patient and dominated the other treatment strategies since more QALYs were achieved at a lower total cost. Sensitivity analyses support the robustness of the model. Conclusion: The results indicate that escitalopram is the most cost-effective pharmacological treatment strategy for the Italian health service compared with other SSRIs and all SNRIs used in the first-line treatment of MDD.
机译:介绍:主要抑郁症(MDD)是世界各地的常见和致残条件。选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIS)和血清素 - 去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIS)是最常用的抗抑郁药。本研究的目的是评估成本效益[?所有SSRIS和所有SNRIS的每个质量调整的终身年份(QALY))在意大利治疗MDD的所有SNRIS。方法:决策分析模型采用瑞典牙科和药物福利机构模型,以反映当前意大利地区MDD的目前临床实践。由于意大利精神科医生和健康经济学家的专家小组的合作,这种适应性是可能的。该模型评估了第一次诊断MDD诊断并首次启动SSRI或SNRI。时间范围为12个月。从文献中检索模型的功效和实用数据并由专家面板验证。基于每个区域卫生服务视角,考虑了局部数据进行资源利用和治疗成本。人口加权区域数据用于定义国家模型。场景模拟,进行单向敏感性分析和蒙特卡罗模拟,以测试模型的稳健性。结果:基本情况分析表明,亚太经产申请与较低的总成本(?1,562)和每位患者的1年(0.732)的健康增益(qalys)相关联,并以较低的qalys实现更多的qalys以来占据了其他治疗策略。总消耗。敏感性分析支持模型的稳健性。结论:结果表明,与其他SSRI和MDD的一线治疗中使用的其他SSRIS和所有SNRIS相比,EscitalPropram是意大利卫生服务最具成本效益的药理学治疗策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号