...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in therapy. >C-QUALITY: Cost and quality-of-life pharmacoeconomic analysis of antidepressants in major depressive disorder in italy
【24h】

C-QUALITY: Cost and quality-of-life pharmacoeconomic analysis of antidepressants in major depressive disorder in italy

机译:C-QUALITY:意大利主要抑郁症患者抗抑郁药的成本和生活质量药物经济学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and disabling condition across the world. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are the most commonly used antidepressants. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness [? per quality-adjusted life year (QALY)] of all SSRIs and all SNRIs for the treatment of MDD in Italy. Methods: A decision analytic model was adapted from the Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits agency model to reflect current clinical practice in the treatment of MDD in the largest Italian regions. This adaptation was possible thanks to the collaboration of an expert panel of Italian psychiatrists and health economists. The model evaluated patients with a first diagnosis of MDD and initiating an SSRI or an SNRI for the first time. The time horizon was 12 months. Efficacy and utility data for the model were retrieved from the literature and validated by the expert panel. Local data were considered for resource utilization and for treatment costs based on each regional health service perspective. Population-weighted regional data were used to define a national model. Scenario simulations, one-way sensitivity analyses, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to test the robustness of the model. Results: The base case analysis showed that escitalopram was associated with a lower total cost (? 1,562) and a larger health gain (QALYs) at 1 year (0.732) per patient and dominated the other treatment strategies since more QALYs were achieved at a lower total cost. Sensitivity analyses support the robustness of the model. Conclusion: The results indicate that escitalopram is the most cost-effective pharmacological treatment strategy for the Italian health service compared with other SSRIs and all SNRIs used in the first-line treatment of MDD.
机译:简介:严重抑郁症(MDD)是世界范围内常见且致残的疾病。选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)是最常用的抗抑郁药。这项研究的目的是评估成本效益[?每个SSRI和所有SNRI的质量调整生命年(QALY)],以治疗意大利的MDD。方法:从瑞典牙科和药品福利局模型中改编了决策分析模型,以反映意大利最大地区的当前治疗MDD的临床实践。这要归功于意大利精神科医生和卫生经济学家的专家小组的合作。该模型评估了首次诊断为MDD并首次启动SSRI或SNRI的患者。时间范围是12个月。从文献中检索该模型的功效和效用数据,并通过专家小组进行验证。根据每个区域卫生服务的观点,考虑了本地数据的资源利用和治疗费用。人口加权区域数据用于定义国家模型。进行了场景模拟,单向敏感性分析和蒙特卡洛模拟,以测试模型的鲁棒性。结果:基础病例分析表明,依他普仑与每位患者1年(0.732)的总费用较低(?1,562)和较大的健康获益(QALYs)相关,并且在其他治疗策略中占主导地位,因为在较低的水平上可获得更多的QALY总计花费。灵敏度分析支持模型的鲁棒性。结论:结果表明,与其他SSRI和用于mdd的一线治疗的所有SNRI相比,依他普仑是意大利卫生服务部门最具成本效益的药物治疗策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号