首页> 外文期刊>Critique >The Utopia of Herbert Marcuse Part 1
【24h】

The Utopia of Herbert Marcuse Part 1

机译:赫伯特·马尔库塞的乌托邦第1部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Herbert Marcuse, the prominent intellectual leader of the student movement in the 1960s, is undoubtedly one of the greatest utopians in modern times. For him utopianism was not so much an unrealistic socioeconomic or political vision of a future society, but rather a vision which breaks radically with the prevailing social thinking, including its 'visions' of future society. The 'end of utopia' is the realization of a possible social utopia. In developing his utopia—in Soviet Marxism, Eros and Civilization, Psychoanalyse und Politik, Gesprche mit Herbert Marcuse, and other works—Marcuse drew upon the Marxian idea of abolition of labor. Marx himself seems to have retreated from this idea. As the other 'abolitions', i.e. the abolition of private property (exploitation) and the abolition of the state, are predicated upon the abolition of labor, this also means a retreat, at least partially, form the theory of liberation from all forms of exploitation and domination. Marcuse resumed the centrality of the abolition of labor in the non-exploitative society: 'It is identical with the transition from capitalism to socialism, if socialism is defined in its most utopian terms: namely, among others, as the abolition of labor…that is to say, life as an end in itself.' In reviving the Marxian idea of abolition of labor Marcuse 'eroticized' non-instrumental production (non-labor production). For him, erotic activity, in a broad sense, was identical with non-instrumental activity. He viewed the pleasure principle in Freud's theory as a principle that stands for non-instrumental activities and non-instrumental society in general. Socialism is all but turning again this principle (which had also appeared in ancient hedonistic socio-philosophical streams) that has been suppressed in the course of human history, into the new basis of society. Thus, productive activity would become play, or sensuous artistic activity. This new, sensuous activity (sensuous, 'erotic' non-labor) would become pivotal in the new, non-exploitative social relations, also envisaged as 'feminist socialism'. The student movement and the New Left were not always aware of the radical, utopian nature of the vision of their intellectual 'father'—a vision, which also involved the transformation of technology into 'convergence of technique and art'.
机译:赫伯特·马尔库塞(Herbert Marcuse),1960年代学生运动的杰出知识领袖,无疑是现代最伟大的空想主义者之一。对他而言,乌托邦主义不仅仅是对未来社会的不切实际的社会经济或政治视野,而是一种与当时的社会思想(包括对未来社会的“愿景”)的根本性打破的视野。 “乌托邦的终结”是实现可能的社会乌托邦。在发展自己的乌托邦时-在苏联马克思主义,爱神与文明,精神分析与政治,Gesprche mit Herbert Marcuse等作品中,马尔库塞借鉴了马克思主义的废除劳动观念。马克思本人似乎已经放弃了这个想法。由于其他“废除”,即废除私有财产(剥削)和废除国家,都是以废除劳动为前提的,因此这也意味着至少部分地从所有形式的自由主义中退缩了。剥削和统治。马尔库塞恢复了在非剥削性社会中废除劳动力的中心地位:“如果以最乌托邦式的定义将社会主义定义为废除劳动,那与从资本主义向社会主义的转变是相同的……也就是说,生命本身就是目的。”在复兴马克思废除劳动的思想时,马尔库塞“色情化”了非工具性生产(非劳动性生产)。对他而言,广义上的色情活动与非乐器活动相同。他认为弗洛伊德理论中的愉悦性原则是代表非工具性活动和整个非工具性社会的原则。社会主义几乎再次将这一在人类历史过程中被压制的原则(也出现在古代享乐主义社会哲学流中)转化为社会的新基础。因此,生产活动将成为一种娱乐活动,或者是感性的艺术活动。这种新的,感性的活动(感性,“色情”的非劳动)将在新的,非剥削性的社会关系(也被设想为“女权社会主义”)中发挥关键作用。学生运动和新左派并不总是意识到他们的知识分子“父亲”的愿景的激进的,乌托邦式的本质。这一愿景还涉及将技术转化为“技术与艺术的融合”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号