首页> 外文期刊>Critical Discourse Studies >Critical discourse analysis and the ethnography of language policy
【24h】

Critical discourse analysis and the ethnography of language policy

机译:批评性话语分析与语言政策民族志

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article explores the compatibility of ethnography and critical discourse analysis (CDA) for the study of language policy. A perennial challenge facing the field of language policy is how to make connections between the macro and micro, and between macro-level policy texts and discourses and micro-level language use. Hornberger and Johnson [(2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509-532] propose the ethnography of language policy as a method for examining the language policy processes within and across the multiple layers of policy creation, interpretation, and appropriation. This paper further explores how CDA can be integrated into ethnographic studies of language policy and proposes that the combination of CDA and ethnography is particularly useful for revealing the connections between the multiple layers of policy activity. Based on a 3-year ethnographic study of bilingual education policy and practice in the School District of Philadelphia, this paper examines the intertextual and interdiscursive links between policy texts and discourses to uncover how the recontextualization of macro-level language policy impacts bilingual education.View full textDownload full textKeywordslanguage policy, ethnography, discourse analysis, sociolinguistics, recontextualizationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.601636
机译:本文探讨了人种学和批评性话语分析(CDA)在语言政策研究中的兼容性。语言政策领域面临的长期挑战是如何在宏观与微观之间以及宏观政策文本和论述与微观语言使用之间建立联系。 Hornberger和Johnson [(2007年)。在人种学上切洋葱:在多语言教学政策和实践中的层次和空间。 TESOL Quarterly,41(3),509-532]提出了语言政策的人种学方法,作为一种检查政策创建,解释和拨款的多个层次之内和之间的语言政策过程的方法。本文进一步探讨了如何将CDA纳入语言政策的民族志研究,并提出CDA和民族志的结合对于揭示政策活动的多个层面之间的联系特别有用。基于对费城学区双语教育政策和实践的三年民族志研究,本文研究了政策文本和语篇之间的互文性和跨语境联系,以揭示宏观语言政策的重新语境化如何影响双语教育。全文下载全文关键字语言政策,人种学,话语分析,社会语言学,重新关联化相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citlikelike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.601636

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号