首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology >Comparison of Supervisory Control Strategies for Series Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Powertrains Through Dynamic Programming
【24h】

Comparison of Supervisory Control Strategies for Series Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Powertrains Through Dynamic Programming

机译:动态规划的插电式混合动力汽车动力总成监控策略比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper compares the optimal fuel and electricity costs associated with two supervisory control strategies for a series plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) using dynamic programming. One strategy has no restrictions on engine fuel usage and the second is restricted to fuel usage only after the battery is depleted below a certain threshold. Both strategies are optimized using deterministic dynamic programming (DDP) to ensure a fair comparison. The DDP algorithm is implemented using a backward-looking powertrain model. Such an approach resolves the computational issues arising because of: 1) the interpolations required to obtain value function estimates and 2) the characterization of constraints through penalty functions. The primary conclusion is that there is no significant difference in the optimal performance of the two control strategies for the series PHEV except when gasoline is unreasonably cheap $({<}{$}1/{rm gal})$. This result contrasts sharply with previous controller performance results for parallel and power-split PHEVs where the two strategies' performance is shown to differ for any gasoline price and driving distance. The reason for the contrast is the flexibility of engine operation in a series PHEV. The results are examined for different relative fuel and electricity prices and trip lengths.
机译:本文使用动态规划比较了串联插电式混合动力汽车(PHEV)的两种监督控制策略的最佳燃料和电力成本。一种策略对发动机燃料的使用没有限制,第二种策略仅在电池电量低于某个阈值后才限制为燃料使用。两种策略都使用确定性动态编程(DDP)进行了优化,以确保公平的比较。 DDP算法是使用后向动力总成模型实现的。这种方法解决了由于以下原因引起的计算问题:1)获得值函数估计所需的插值; 2)通过惩罚函数表征约束。主要结论是,串联控制电动汽车的两种控制策略的最佳性能没有显着差异,除非汽油价格过低($ {{}} $$ 1 / {rm gal})$。该结果与之前针对并联和功率分离式PHEV的控制器性能结果形成鲜明对比,后者在任何汽油价格和行驶距离下,两种策略的性能均存在差异。形成对比的原因是PHEV系列中发动机操作的灵活性。检查结果以了解不同的相对燃料和电力价格以及行程时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号