首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >The effect of informal social support: Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication
【24h】

The effect of informal social support: Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication

机译:非正式社会支持的效果:面对面交流与计算机媒介交流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Survey data were collected on a military sample to test two main hypotheses about the impact of face-to-face and computer-mediated social support following disruptive life events. We tested two main hypotheses: first, as previous research indicates, the impact of a disruptive life event is partially dependent upon the amount of social support one receives during the time of the event (HI). Second, the type of communication used will further impact the effectiveness of social support in comforting individuals following a negative life event. Results support both hypotheses, indicating that the buffering role of social support following a disruptive life event is not only dependent upon the amount of social support one receives, but is further affected by the type of communication that participants used to receive support. These findings provide support for the buffering hypothesis' utility in the realm of computer-mediated communication, as well as the application of the cues-filtered-out approach in the mediated social support domain.
机译:在军事样本上收集了调查数据,以检验关于颠覆性生活事件后面对面和计算机介导的社会支持的影响的两个主要假设。我们测试了两个主要假设:首先,如先前的研究所示,破坏性生活事件的影响部分取决于事件发生期间(HI)所获得的社会支持的数量。其次,所使用的交流类型将进一步影响社会支持在消极生活事件后安慰个人的有效性。结果支持这两种假设,表明破坏性生活事件后社会支持的缓冲作用不仅取决于一个人获得的社会支持的数量,而且还进一步受到参与者用来获得支持的交流类型的影响。这些发现为缓冲假说在计算机介导的交流领域中的效用提供了支持,也为线索筛选出的方法在介导的社会支持领域中的应用提供了支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号