首页> 外文期刊>Computers & education >Technology Enhanced Learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement
【24h】

Technology Enhanced Learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement

机译:高等教育中的技术增强学习;动机,敬业度和学术成就

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) has become a common feature of Higher Education. However, research has been hindered by a lack of differentiation between usage and engagement and not recognising the heterogeneity of TEL applications. The current study aimed to assess the impact of emotional, cognitive and behavioural engagement with TEL on students' grades and to also look at how motivation levels differentially predict engagement across different types of TEL. In a sample of 524 undergraduate students, we measured engagement and usage of TEL, student learning motivations and self-report student grades. Our results indicate that intrinsic motivations predict engagement, whilst extrinsic motivations predict usage. Importantly, engagement was predictive of grades whereas usage was not. Furthermore, when TEL was broken down by type, the use of social media groups was a significant predictor of grade, whereas reviewing lecture slides/recordings, reading additional content and using course blogs/discussion boards were not. We conclude that a sole focus on usage of TEL is misleading. Implications for researchers and educators are discussed.
机译:技术增强学习(TEL)已成为高等教育的共同特征。但是,由于使用和参与之间缺乏区分,并且未认识到TEL应用程序的异质性,研究受到了阻碍。当前的研究旨在评估TEL的情感,认知和行为参与对学生成绩的影响,并研究动机水平如何不同地预测不同TEL类型的参与。在524名本科生的样本中,我们测量了TEL的参与和使用情况,学生的学习动机和自我报告的学生成绩。我们的结果表明,内在动机预测参与度,而外在动机预测使用率。重要的是,参与度可以预测成绩,而使用率则不能。此外,按类型划分电话时,社交媒体组的使用是成绩的重要预测指标,而审查演讲幻灯片/录音,阅读其他内容以及使用课程博客/讨论板则不是。我们得出的结论是,仅关注TEL的使用具有误导性。讨论了对研究人员和教育工作者的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号