首页> 外文期刊>Computer applications in engineering education >Evaluating the Accessibility of Three Open-Source Learning Content Management Systems: A Comparative Study
【24h】

Evaluating the Accessibility of Three Open-Source Learning Content Management Systems: A Comparative Study

机译:评估三种开源学习内容管理系统的可访问性:一项比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Learning content management systems (LCMSs) have become increasingly popular in the educational field over the past few years. However, problems in system design can create difficulties in the interactions between LCMSs and an important sector of the user population. The assessment and monitoring of LCMS accessibility are vital for the guarantee of universal accessibility in education. This article presents a comparative study of the accessibility of three web-based, open-source LCMSs: Moodle, ATutor, and Sakai. Results of the study indicate that barriers to accessibility are present in each of the three systems evaluated. A primary aim of the study is to help detect and correct these barriers such that the goal of universal access in educational environments may one day be achieved.
机译:在过去的几年中,学习内容管理系统(LCMS)在教育领域变得越来越流行。但是,系统设计中的问题可能会在LCMS与用户群体的重要部门之间的交互中造成困难。 LCMS可及性的评估和监控对于保证教育的普遍可及性至关重要。本文对三种基于Web的开源LCMS(Moodle,ATutor和Sakai)的可访问性进行了比较研究。研究结果表明,所评估的三个系统中的每一个都存在障碍。这项研究的主要目的是帮助检测和纠正这些障碍,从而有一天可以实现教育环境中普遍接入的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号