首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating the Accessibility of Three Open-Source Learning Content Management Systems: A Comparative Study
【2h】

Evaluating the Accessibility of Three Open-Source Learning Content Management Systems: A Comparative Study

机译:评估三种开源学习内容管理系统的可访问性:比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Learning content management systems (LCMSs) have become increasingly popular in the educationalfield over the past few years. However, problems in system design can create difficulties in the interactionsbetween LCMSs and an important sector of the user population. The assessment and monitoring ofLCMS accessibility are vital for the guarantee of universal accessibility in education. This article presents acomparative study of the accessibility of three web-based, open-source LCMSs: Moodle, ATutor, and Sakai.Results of the study indicate that barriers to accessibility are present in each of the three systems evaluated. Aprimary aim of the study is to help detect and correct these barriers such that the goal of universal access ineducational environments may one day be achieved.
机译:在过去的几年中,学习内容管理系统(LCMS)在教育领域变得越来越流行。然而,系统设计中的问题会在LCMS与用户群体的重要部门之间的交互中造成困难。 LCMS可及性的评估和监控对于保证教育的普遍可及性至关重要。本文对三种基于Web的开源LCMS:Moodle,ATutor和Sakai进行了可访问性的比较研究。研究结果表明,所评估的三个系统中的每一个都存在访问障碍。这项研究的主要目的是帮助检测和纠正这些障碍,从而有一天可以实现普及教育环境的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号