首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Randomised, double blind, crossover challenge study of allergenicity of peanut oils in subjects allergic to peanuts
【24h】

Randomised, double blind, crossover challenge study of allergenicity of peanut oils in subjects allergic to peanuts

机译:对花生过敏者中花生油致敏性的随机,双盲,交叉挑战研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To determine the in vivo allergenicity of two grades of peanut oil for a large group of subjects with proved allergy to peanuts. Design: Double blind, crossover food challenge with crude peanut oil and refined peanut oil. Setting: Dedicated clinical investigation unit in a university hospital. Subjects: 60 subjects allergic to peanuts; allergy was confirmed by challenge tests. Outcome measures: Allergic reaction to the tested peanut oils. Results: None of the 60 subjects reacted to the refined oil; six (10%) reacted to the crude oil. Supervised peanut challenge caused considerably less severe reactions than subjects had reported previously. Conclusions: Crude peanut oil caused allergic reactions in 10% of allergic subjects studied and should continue to be avoided. Refined peanut oil did not pose a risk to any of the subjects. It would be reasonable to recommend a change in labelling to distinguish refined from crude peanut oil.
机译:目的:为证实对花生过敏的一大批受试者确定两种等级的花生油的体内过敏性。设计:用粗花生油和精制花生油进行双盲交叉食品挑战。地点:大学医院的专用临床调查单位。受试者:60名对花生过敏的受试者;挑战测试证实了过敏。结果措施:对被测花生油的过敏反应。结果:60名受试者中没有人对精制油有反应;六(10%)个与原油反应。有监督的花生挑战所引起的严重反应比以前报道的要少得多。结论:粗花生油在所研究的过敏受试者中引起了10%的过敏反应,应继续避免。精制花生油不会对任何受试者造成危险。建议更改标签以区分精制花生油和花生粗油是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号