...
首页> 外文期刊>Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education >Student ratings of college teaching: a comparison of faculty and their students
【24h】

Student ratings of college teaching: a comparison of faculty and their students

机译:大学教学的学生评价:教职员工与其学生的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Based on the review of student ratings myths by Aleamoni (1987, 1999), a survey research design was used to analyse differences between college students' (n = 968) and faculty's (n = 34) perceptions. Generally, students held stronger beliefs in these myths, in that they believed faculty with excellent publication records were better qualified to evaluate teaching and that student ratings on single general items are accurate measures of teaching effectiveness. On the other hand, faculty believed that student ratings were invalid and unreliable. Further examination of student characteristics revealed that male students held stronger beliefs in these myths. Finally, students' beliefs in these myths were correlated with their actual ratings of nine dimensions of the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality. A discussion as well as suggestions for using student ratings is provided.View full textDownload full textKeywordsteaching effectiveness, professor evaluation, student ratings, personnel evaluationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930902795901
机译:基于Aleamoni(1987,1999)对学生评级神话的回顾,采用了一项调查研究设计来分析大学生(n = 968)和教师(n = 34)感知之间的差异。通常,学生对这些神话抱有更强烈的信念,因为他们认为拥有出色出版物记录的教师更有资格评估教学,并且学生对单个常规项目的评分是衡量教学效果的准确指标。另一方面,教师认为学生的评分是无效和不可靠的。对学生特征的进一步检查表明,男生对这些神话抱有更强的信念。最后,学生对这些神话的信念与他们对学生的教育质量评价的九个方面的实际评分相关。提供了有关使用学生评分的讨论和建议。查看全文下载全文关键字教学效果,教授评估,学生评分,人员评估相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter, technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930902795901

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号