...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Health Sciences Education >Item Response Theory Test Equating in Health Sciences Education
【24h】

Item Response Theory Test Equating in Health Sciences Education

机译:健康科学教育中的项目反应理论测试等式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the context of health sciences education, and education in general, the knowledge or ability of one or several subjects in a specific area is frequently compared using different forms of a test, or by means of different instruments aimed at measuring this knowledge or ability. In such cases, test scores must be equated so that they can be properly compared. The present article aims to explain the equating of scores within the framework of item response theory (IRT), special emphasis being placed on its application in the field of health sciences education. Although there are many data collection designs that can be used within the framework of score equating, the three most widely used designs are single group, randomly equivalent groups and non-equivalent groups with anchor test. Likewise, there are different equating procedures within IRT, such as the mean/mean and mean/sigma methods, or methods based on the characteristic curve. The equating of scores must ensure that examinees taking a test do so under the same conditions; however, the procedure is also highly useful in creating a bank of items that can be used subsequently in new tests.
机译:在健康科学教育以及一般的教育背景下,经常使用不同形式的测试或通过旨在测量该知识或能力的不同工具来比较特定领域中一个或多个学科的知识或能力。在这种情况下,必须将考试成绩等同,以便可以正确比较它们。本文旨在在项目反应理论(IRT)的框架内解释分数的相等性,特别强调其在健康科学教育领域中的应用。尽管有许多数据收集设计可在评分等值框架内使用,但使用锚测试的三个最广泛使用的设计是单个组,随机等效组和非等效组。同样,IRT中存在不同的等价过程,例如均值/均值和均值/ sigma方法,或基于特征曲线的方法。分数相等必须确保参加考试的考生在相同条件下参加考试;但是,该过程在创建可在新测试中随后使用的项目库中也非常有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号