首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Effects of a contoured articular prosthetic device on tibiofemoral peak contact pressure: a biomechanical study
【2h】

Effects of a contoured articular prosthetic device on tibiofemoral peak contact pressure: a biomechanical study

机译:轮廓轮廓的人工修复装置对胫股最大接触压力的影响:生物力学研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many middle-aged patients are affected by localized cartilage defects that are neither appropriate for primary, nor repeat biological repair methods, nor for conventional arthroplasty. This in vitro study aims to determine the peak contact pressure in the tibiofemoral joint with a partial femoral resurfacing device (HemiCAP®, Arthrosurface Inc., Franklin, MA, USA). Peak contact pressure was determined in eight fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens using a Tekscan sensor placed in the medial compartment above the menisci. A closed loop robotic knee simulator was used to test each knee in static stance positions (5°/15°/30°/45°) with body weight ground reaction force (GRF), 30° flexion with twice the body weight (2tBW) GRF and dynamic knee-bending cycles with body weight GRF. The ground reaction force was adjusted to the living body weight of the cadaver donor and maintained throughout all cycles. Each specimen was tested under four different conditions: Untreated, flush HemiCAP® implantation, 1-mm proud implantation and 20-mm defect. A paired sampled t test to compare means (significance, P ≤ 0.05) was used for statistical analysis. On average, no statistically significant differences were found in any testing condition comparing the normal knee with flush device implantation. With the 1-mm proud implant, statistically significant increase of peak contact pressures of 217% (5° stance), 99% (dynamic knee bending) and 90% (30° stance with 2tBW) compared to the untreated condition was seen. No significant increase of peak contact pressure was evaluated with the 20-mm defect. The data suggests that resurfacing with the HemiCAP® does not lead to increased peak contact pressure with flush implantation. However, elevated implantation results in increased peak contact pressure and might be biomechanically disadvantageous in an in vivo application.
机译:许多中年患者受到局限性软骨缺损的影响,这些缺陷既不适合原发灶,也不适合重复生物修复方法,也不适合常规关节置换术。这项体外研究旨在通过部分股骨表面置换装置(HemiCAP ®,Arthrosurface Inc.,美国马萨诸塞州富兰克林)确定胫股关节的峰值接触压力。使用放置在半月板上方内侧隔室中的Tekscan传感器,在八个新鲜冷冻的尸体标本中确定了峰值接触压力。使用闭环机器人膝部模拟器以体重地面反作用力(GRF),30度屈曲和两倍体重(2tBW)来测试每个膝盖在静态姿势位置(5°/ 15°/ 30°/ 45°)体重GRF和GRF和动态膝盖弯曲周期。将地面反作用力调整为尸体供体的活体重量,并在所有周期中保持不变。每个标本均在四种不同条件下进行测试:未经处理的齐平HemiCAP ®植入,1-mm骄傲植入和20mm缺陷。采用配对抽样的t检验比较均值(显着性,P≤0.05)进行统计分析。平均而言,在任何测试条件下,将正常膝关节与同花顺装置植入进行比较,均未发现统计学上的显着差异。与未经处理的情况相比,使用直径为1 mm的引人注目的植入物,峰值接触压力在统计学上显着增加了217%(5°姿态),99%(动态膝盖弯曲)和90%(30t姿态2tBW)。对于20mm缺陷,峰值接触压力没有明显增加。数据表明,使用HemiCAP ®进行表面重铺不会导致冲洗植入时峰值接触压力增加。然而,增加的植入导致增加的峰值接触压力,并且在体内应用中可能在生物力学上不利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号