首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer
【2h】

A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer

机译:拉帕替尼+帕唑帕尼与拉帕替尼治疗HER2 +炎性乳腺癌患者的随机II期研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This multi-center Phase II study evaluated lapatinib, pazopanib, and the combination in patients with relapsed HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer. In Cohort 1, 76 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive lapatinib 1,500 mg + placebo or lapatinib 1,500 mg + pazopanib 800 mg (double-blind) once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Due to high-grade diarrhea observed with this dose combination in another study (), Cohort 1 was closed. The protocol was amended such that an additional 88 patients (Cohort 2) were randomized in a 5:5:2 ratio to receive daily monotherapy lapatinib 1,500 mg, lapatinib 1,000 mg + pazopanib 400 mg, or monotherapy pazopanib 800 mg, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. In Cohort 1, ORR for the lapatinib (n = 38) and combination (n = 38) arms was 29 and 45 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.1 and 14.3 weeks, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the combination arm (71 %) than in the lapatinib arm (24 %). Dose reductions and interruptions due to AEs were also more frequent in the combination arm (45 and 53 %, respectively) than in the lapatinib monotherapy arm (0 and 11 %, respectively). In Cohort 2, ORR for patients treated with lapatinib (n = 36), lapatinib + pazopanib (n = 38), and pazopanib (n = 13) was 47, 58, and 31 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.0, 16.0, and 11.4 weeks, respectively. In the lapatinib, combination, and pazopanib therapy arms, grade ≥3 AEs were reported for 17, 50, and 46 % of patients, respectively, and the incidence of discontinuations due to AEs was 0, 24, and 23 %, respectively. The lapatinib–pazopanib combination was associated with a numerically higher ORR but no increase in PFS compared to lapatinib alone. The combination also had increased toxicity resulting in more dose reductions, modifications, and treatment delays. Activity with single-agent lapatinib was confirmed in this population.
机译:这项多中心II期研究评估了HER2 +炎症性乳腺癌复发患者中的拉帕替尼,帕唑帕尼及其组合。在第1队列中,每天将76名患者按1:1比例随机分配至接受lapatinib 1,500 mg +安慰剂或lapatinib 1,500 mg + pazopanib 800 mg(双盲),直至疾病进展,不可接受的毒性或死亡。由于在另一项研究中使用此剂量组合观察到严重腹泻,因此队列1已关闭。对该方案进行了修订,使另外88名患者(队列2)以5:5:2的比例随机分配,分别接受每日单药1,500毫克拉帕替尼,拉帕替尼1,000毫克+帕唑帕尼400毫克或帕唑帕尼单药800毫克的每日治疗。主要终点是总体缓解率(ORR)。次要终点包括反应持续时间,无进展生存期(PFS),总体生存期和安全性。在队列1中,拉帕替尼(n = 38)和组合(n = 38)臂的ORR分别为29%和45%; PFS中位数分别为16.1周和14.3周。 ≥3级不良事件(AEs)在联合治疗组(71%)中比拉帕替尼治疗组(24%)更为频繁。与拉帕替尼单药治疗组(分别为0%和11%)相比,组合组(分别为45%和53%)中因AE引起的剂量减少和中断更为频繁。在队列2中,接受拉帕替尼(n = 36),拉帕替尼+帕唑帕尼(n = 38)和帕唑帕尼(n = 13)治疗的患者的ORR分别为47%,58%和31%; PFS中位数分别为16.0、16.0和11.4周。在拉帕替尼,联合治疗和帕唑帕尼治疗组中,分别有17%,50%和46%的患者报告≥3级AEs,并且因AEs停药的发生率分别为0%,24%和23%。与单独使用拉帕替尼相比,拉帕替尼-帕唑帕尼联合治疗的ORR数值较高,但PFS却没有增加。该组合还具有增加的毒性,导致更多的剂量减少,修饰和治疗延迟。在该人群中证实了单药拉帕替尼的活性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号