首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Practicalities of mapping PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations on city-wide scales using a portable particulate monitor
【2h】

Practicalities of mapping PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations on city-wide scales using a portable particulate monitor

机译:使用便携式颗粒物监测仪在城市范围内绘制PM10和PM2.5浓度的实用性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Fine particulate matter is considered to be the most significant ambient air pollutant in terms of potential health impacts. Therefore, it is important that regulators are able to accurately assess the exposure of populations to PM10 and PM2.5 across municipal areas. We report on the practicalities of using a laser light scattering portable particulate monitor (Turnkey Instruments DustMate), in combination with a GPS, to map PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations on city-wide scales in Newcastle upon Tyne/Gateshead (UK), during a series of walking surveys. A heated inlet is necessary to remove moisture droplets from the sampled air prior to analysis by the instrument, though this also results in the loss of volatile particulate components, particularly from the PM2.5 fraction. A co-location calibration study was carried out with a reference urban background Tapered Element Oscillating Micro-Balance/Filter Dynamics Measuring System (TEOM-FDMS) system in Newcastle that is part of the UK’s Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN) of air quality monitoring stations. For PM10, orthogonal regression of the DustMate against TEOM-FDMS data gave a slope and intercept of 1.02 ± 0.06 and −3.7 ± 1.2, respectively (R 2 = 0.73), whereas for PM2.5, the respective values were 0.78 ± 0.06 and −0.63 ± 0.55 (R 2 = 0.79). These parameters are comparable to literature calibration studies using this technology. There was good agreement between simultaneous samples taken using two DustMate instruments: for PM10, a slope and intercept of 1.05 ± 0.03 and 0.36 ± 0.5, respectively (R 2 = 0.73), were obtained, whereas for the PM2.5, the respective values were 0.79 ± 0.01 and 0.19 ± 0.06 (R 2 = 0.86). Correction factors based on the slope and intercepts obtained from the calibration exercise were applied to raw data collected from the DustMate. An annually-normalised correction procedure was then used to account for different background particulate concentrations on different sampling days. These corrected PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations and corresponding GPS coordinates were displayed on a base map using Google Fusion Tables and Google Earth Professional. Almost all areas surveyed in Newcastle/Gateshead were well below the EU Air Quality Standards for PM10 and PM2.5.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11869-016-0394-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:就潜在的健康影响而言,细颗粒物被认为是最重要的环境空气污染物。因此,重要的是监管机构必须能够准确评估整个城市地区人群暴露于PM10和PM2.5的程度。我们报告了使用激光散射便携式颗粒物监测仪(Turnkey Instruments DustMate)与GPS结合在纽卡斯尔泰恩/盖茨黑德(英国)全市范围内绘制PM10和PM2.5浓度的实用性的报告。一系列步行调查。在通过仪器分析之前,必须有一个加热的入口来从采样空气中除去水分,尽管这也会导致挥发性颗粒成分的损失,特别是从PM2.5馏分中损失。在英国纽卡斯尔进行的同位置校准研究以参考城市背景为基础的锥形元素振荡微平衡/过滤器动态测量系统(TEOM-FDMS)系统是英国空气质量自动城乡网络(AURN)的一部分监测站。对于PM10,DustMate对TEOM-FDMS数据的正交回归给出的斜率和截距分别为1.02±0.06和-3.7±1.2(R 2 = 0.73),而对于PM2.5,分别为0.78±0.06和-0.63±0.55(R 2 = 0.79)。这些参数与使用该技术的文献校准研究相当。使用两种DustMate仪器同时采集的样品之间具有良好的一致性:对于PM10,其斜率和截距分别为1.05±0.03和0.36±0.5(R 2 = 0.73),而对于PM2.5分别为0.79±0.01和0.19±0.06(R 2 = 0.86)。基于从校准练习获得的斜率和截距的校正因子被应用于从DustMate收集的原始数据。然后使用每年标准化的校正程序来说明不同采样日的不同背景颗粒浓度。使用Google Fusion Tables和Google Earth Professional在底图上显示这些校正后的PM10和PM2.5浓度以及相应的GPS坐标。纽卡斯尔/盖茨黑德几乎所有调查的地区都远低于欧盟的PM10和PM2.5空气质量标准。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s11869-016-0394-3)包含补充材料,该材料为可供授权用户使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号