首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >A practical approach to programmatic assessment design
【2h】

A practical approach to programmatic assessment design

机译:程序评估设计的实用方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Assessment of complex tasks integrating several competencies calls for a programmatic design approach. As single instruments do not provide the information required to reach a robust judgment of integral performance, 73 guidelines for programmatic assessment design were developed. When simultaneously applying these interrelated guidelines, it is challenging to keep a clear overview of all assessment activities. The goal of this study was to provide practical support for applying a programmatic approach to assessment design, not bound to any specific educational paradigm. The guidelines were first applied in a postgraduate medical training setting, and a process analysis was conducted. This resulted in the identification of four steps for programmatic assessment design: evaluation, contextualisation, prioritisation and justification. Firstly, the (re)design process starts with sufficiently detailing the assessment environment and formulating the principal purpose. Key stakeholders with sufficient (assessment) expertise need to be involved in the analysis of strengths and weaknesses and identification of developmental needs. Central governance is essential to balance efforts and stakes with the principal purpose and decide on prioritisation of design decisions and selection of relevant guidelines. Finally, justification of assessment design decisions, quality assurance and external accountability close the loop, to ensure sound underpinning and continuous improvement of the assessment programme.
机译:评估具有多种能力的复杂任务需要一种程序设计方法。由于单一工具无法提供对整体绩效做出可靠判断所需的信息,因此制定了73项计划评估设计指南。在同时应用这些相互关联的准则时,保持所有评估活动的清晰概述是一项挑战。这项研究的目的是为将程序性方法应用于评估设计提供实用的支持,而不限于任何特定的教育范式。该准则首先在研究生医学培训环境中应用,并进行了过程分析。这样就确定了计划评估设计的四个步骤:评估,情境化,优先级划分和论证。首先,(重新)设计过程首先要充分详细说明评估环境并制定主要目的。具有足够(评估)专业知识的主要利益相关者需要参与长处和短处的分析并确定发展需求。中央治理对于平衡工作和利益与主要目的,决定设计决策的优先级和选择相关准则至关重要。最后,评估设计决策,质量保证和外部问责制的论据是紧密相连的,以确保评估计划的良好基础和持续改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号