首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >A practical approach to programmatic assessment design
【24h】

A practical approach to programmatic assessment design

机译:编程评估设计的实用方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Assessment of complex tasks integrating several competencies calls for a programmatic design approach. As single instruments do not provide the information required to reach a robust judgment of integral performance, 73 guidelines for programmatic assessment design were developed. When simultaneously applying these interrelated guidelines, it is challenging to keep a clear overview of all assessment activities. The goal of this study was to provide practical support for applying a programmatic approach to assessment design, not bound to any specific educational paradigm. The guidelines were first applied in a postgraduate medical training setting, and a process analysis was conducted. This resulted in the identification of four steps for programmatic assessment design: evaluation, contextualisation, prioritisation and justification. Firstly, the (re)design process starts with sufficiently detailing the assessment environment and formulating the principal purpose. Key stakeholders with sufficient (assessment) expertise need to be involved in the analysis of strengths and weaknesses and identification of developmental needs. Central governance is essential to balance efforts and stakes with the principal purpose and decide on prioritisation of design decisions and selection of relevant guidelines. Finally, justification of assessment design decisions, quality assurance and external accountability close the loop, to ensure sound underpinning and continuous improvement of the assessment programme.
机译:摘要复杂任务的评估整合了几种能力呼吁进行编程设计方法。由于单一仪器不提供达到积分性能稳健判断所需的信息,开发了73个编程评估设计指南。同时应用这些相互关联的指导方针时,清楚地概述所有评估活动是挑战性的。本研究的目标是提供对应用程序化方法的实际支持,不受任何特定教育范式的约束。该指南首先在研究生医疗训练环境中申请,并进行了过程分析。这导致识别用于编程评估设计的四个步骤:评估,语境化,优先级和理由。首先,(重新)设计过程开始充分详细说明评估环境并制定主要目的。具有足够的主要利益相关者(评估)专业知识需要参与分析优势和劣势和识别发展需求。中央治理对于通过主要目的平衡努力和股份,并决定设计决策的优先次序和相关指南的选择。最后,评估设计决策的理由,质量保证和外部问责制的关闭循环,以确保健全的顽固性和持续改进评估计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号