首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Effects of Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Preschoolers (MTFC-P) for Young Foster Children with Severe Behavioral Disturbances
【2h】

Effects of Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Preschoolers (MTFC-P) for Young Foster Children with Severe Behavioral Disturbances

机译:学龄前儿童的多维治疗寄养服务(MTFC-P)对幼儿寄养儿童的影响严重的行为障碍

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Preschoolers (MTFC-P) has thus far only been tested for diminishing behavior problems in the US. This study tested relative efficacy of MTFC-P on multiple outcomes against treatment as usual in the Netherlands (TAU; Study I), and regular foster care (Study II). The sample included 55 children that received MTFC-P, 23 children received TAU and 30 children from regular foster care (RFC). Changes in behavioral and relationship functioning, trauma symptoms, hypothalamic-adrenal-pituitary (HPA-) axis functioning, and caregiving stress were assessed via questionnaires, interviews, and salivary cortisol. Outcomes of Study I were evaluated using a randomized controlled design and quasi-experimental design, outcomes of Study II according to non-equivalent group comparison. No evidence was found for relative efficacy of MTFC-P over TAU. A treatment effect was found on trauma symptoms, in favor of TAU. Outcomes of Study II revealed that whereas caregiving stress and secure base distortions were significantly more severe at baseline in MTFC-P compared to RFC, post treatment differences were no longer significant. However, percentages of symptoms of disinhibited attachment and attachment disorder were nearly equal between groups at baseline, while post treatment percentages indicated significantly more symptoms in MTFC. In addition, results revealed a significant difference in the severity of externalizing problems post treatment, in favor of RFC. The results obtained within this study indicate that children in MTFC-P and usual treatment foster care in the Dutch context improved similarly, thus not showing the same advantages that MTFC-P has demonstrated in the US. Results should be interpreted with caution due to lower than planned power. Findings underscore the challenges of testing novel treatments across contexts with highly different child welfare provisions.
机译:到目前为止,针对美国学龄前儿童的多维治疗寄养服务(MTFC-P)仅针对减少行为问题进行了测试。这项研究测试了MTFC-P在多种结局方面相对于荷兰的常规治疗(TAU;研究I)和常规寄养(研究II)的相对功效。样本包括55名接受MTFC-P的儿童,23名接受TAU的儿童和30名接受常规寄养(RFC)的儿童。通过问卷,访谈和唾液皮质醇评估行为和关系功能,创伤症状,下丘脑-肾上腺垂体(HPA-)轴功能和护理压力的变化。研究I的结果使用随机对照设计和准实验设计进行评估,研究II的结果根据非等效组比较进行评估。没有证据表明MTFC-P相对于TAU具有相对功效。发现对创伤症状的治疗效果,有利于TAU。研究II的结果表明,尽管与RFC相比,MTFC-P的护理压力和安全基础扭曲在基线时更为严重,但治疗后的差异不再明显。然而,基线时两组之间的解除抑制性依恋和依恋障碍症状百分率几乎相等,而治疗后百分率表明MTFC中的症状明显更多。此外,研究结果表明,在处理RFC之后,外部化问题的严重性存在显着差异。在这项研究中获得的结果表明,在荷兰背景下接受MTFC-P的儿童和常规治疗寄养儿童的情况得到了类似的改善,因此没有显示出MTFC-P在美国表现出的相同优势。由于功率低于计划,因此应谨慎解释结果。研究结果突显了在具有截然不同的儿童福利规定的情况下测试新颖疗法的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号