首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Development and first evaluation of a novel multiplex real-time PCR on whole blood samples for rapid pathogen identification in critically ill patients with sepsis
【2h】

Development and first evaluation of a novel multiplex real-time PCR on whole blood samples for rapid pathogen identification in critically ill patients with sepsis

机译:新型多重实时PCR技术在全血样品上的开发和首次评估可用于危重病败血症患者的快速病原体鉴定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Molecular tests may enable early adjustment of antimicrobial therapy and be complementary to blood culture (BC) which has imperfect sensitivity in critically ill patients. We evaluated a novel multiplex real-time PCR assay to diagnose bloodstream pathogens directly in whole blood samples (BSI-PCR). BSI-PCR included 11 species- and four genus-specific PCRs, a molecular Gram-stain PCR, and two antibiotic resistance markers. We collected 5 mL blood from critically ill patients simultaneously with clinically indicated BC. Microbial DNA was isolated using the Polaris method followed by automated DNA extraction. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using BC as reference. BSI-PCR was evaluated in 347 BC-positive samples (representing up to 50 instances of each pathogen covered by the test) and 200 BC-negative samples. Bacterial species-specific PCR sensitivities ranged from 65 to 100%. Sensitivity was 26% for the Gram-positive PCR, 32% for the Gram-negative PCR, and ranged 0 to 7% for yeast PCRs. Yeast detection was improved to 40% in a smaller set-up. There was no overall association between BSI-PCR sensitivity and time-to-positivity of BC (which was highly variable), yet Ct-values were lower for true-positive versus false-positive PCR results. False-positive results were observed in 84 (4%) of the 2200 species-specific PCRs in 200 culture-negative samples, and ranged from 0 to 6% for generic PCRs. Sensitivity of BSI-PCR was promising for individual bacterial pathogens, but still insufficient for yeasts and generic PCRs. Further development of BSI-PCR will focus on improving sensitivity by increasing input volumes and on subsequent implementation as a bedside test.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s10096-018-3255-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:分子检测可以使抗微生物治疗的早期调整成为可能,并且可以补充血培养(BC),后者对危重患者的敏感性不完善。我们评估了一种新颖的多重实时PCR分析法,可直接在全血样品中诊断血流病原体(BSI-PCR)。 BSI-PCR包括11种和4个属特异性PCR,分子革兰氏染色PCR和2种抗生素抗性标记。我们从重症患者中收集5 mL血液,并同时进行临床指示的BC。使用Polaris方法分离微生物DNA,然后进行自动DNA提取。敏感性和特异性以BC为参考计算。在347例BC阳性样本(代表该测试涵盖的每种病原体最多50个实例)和200例BC阴性样本中评估了BSI-PCR。细菌物种特异性PCR的敏感度范围为65%至100%。革兰氏阳性PCR的敏感性为26%,革兰氏阴性PCR的敏感性为32%,酵母PCR的敏感性为0至7%。在较小的设置中,酵母检测率提高到40%。 BSI-PCR敏感性和BC的阳性时间之间没有整体关联(这是高度可变的),但是对于真实阳性和假阳性PCR结果,Ct值都较低。在200个培养阴性样品的2200种物种特异性PCR中,有84种(4%)观察到假阳性结果,对于普通PCR,结果为0%至6%。 BSI-PCR的敏感性对单个细菌病原体是有希望的,但对于酵母和通用PCR仍然不够。 BSI-PCR的进一步发展将侧重于通过增加输入量来提高灵敏度以及随后在床旁测试中的实现。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(10.1007 / s10096-018-3255-1)包含补充材料,可以通过以下途径获得给授权用户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号