首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Policy and Management >Contextual Factors Influencing Cost and Quality Decisions in Health and Care: A Structured Evidence Review and Narrative Synthesis
【2h】

Contextual Factors Influencing Cost and Quality Decisions in Health and Care: A Structured Evidence Review and Narrative Synthesis

机译:影响卫生保健中成本和质量决策的上下文因素:结构化证据审查和叙述性综合

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Decisions affecting cost and quality are taken across health and care but investigation of the mediating role of context in these is in its infancy. This paper presents a synthesis of the evidence on the contextual factors that influence ‘decisions of value’ – defined as those characterised by having a significant and demonstrable impact on both quality and resources – in health and care. The review considers the full range of resource/quality decisions and synthesises knowledge on the contextual drivers of these. >Methods: The method involved structured evidence review and narrative synthesis. Literature was identified through searches of electronic databases (HMIC, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, NHS Evidence, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, ABI Inform/Proquest), journal and bibliography hand-searching and snowball searching using citation analysis. Structured data extraction was performed drawing out descriptive information and content against review aims and questions. Data synthesis followed a thematic approach in accordance with the varied nature of the retrieved literature. >Results: Twenty-one literature items reporting 14 research studies and seven literature reviews met the inclusion criteria. The review shows that in health and care contexts, research into decisions of value in health and care is in its infancy and contains wide variation in approach and remit. The evidence is drawn from a range of service and country settings and this reduces generalisability or transferability of findings. An area of relative strength in the published evidence is inquiry into factors influencing coverage and commissioning decisions in health care systems. Allocative decisions have therefore been more consistently researched than technical decisions. We use Pettigrew’s (1985) distinction between inner and outer context to structure analysis of the range of factors reported as being influential. These include: evidence/information, organisational culture and governance regimes, and; economic and political conditions. >Conclusion: Decisions of value in health and care are subject to range of intersecting influences that often lead to a departure from narrow notions of rational decision-making. Future research should pay greater attention to the relatively under-explored area of technical, as opposed to allocative, decision-making.
机译:>背景:影响成本和质量的决策是在医疗和保健机构中做出的,但对环境在其中的中介作用的调查尚处于起步阶段。本文介绍了影响“价值决定”的背景因素的证据综合,这些因素被定义为对医疗和保健领域的质量和资源产生重大且可证明的影响。审查会考虑所有资源/质量决策,并综合有关这些决策的上下文驱动因素的知识。 >方法:该方法涉及结构化证据审查和叙述性综合。通过电子数据库(HMIC,Medline,Embase,CINAHL,NHS证据,Cochrane,Web of Knowledge,ABI Inform / Proquest),期刊和书目手工搜索以及使用引文分析的雪球搜索来识别文献。进行结构化的数据提取,以提取描述性信息和内容,以达到审查目的和问题。根据检索文献的不同性质,数据合成遵循主题方法。 >结果:报告14项研究和21篇文献评论的21篇文献符合入选标准。审查表明,在卫生和医疗保健方面,对卫生和医疗保健价值决策的研究尚处于起步阶段,并且在方法和职权范围上存在很大差异。证据来自各种服务和国家/地区设置,这降低了调查结果的普遍性或可移植性。在已发表的证据中,相对优势的一个领域是对影响医疗保健系统覆盖率和委托决策的因素进行调查。因此,与技术决策相比,对分配决策的研究更加一致。我们使用Pettigrew(1985)对内部和外部环境的区分来对报告为有影响力的因素范围进行结构分析。这些包括:证据/信息,组织文化和治理制度,以及经济和政治条件。 >结论:保健和护理领域的价值决策受到一系列相互影响的影响,这些影响常常导致偏离理性决策的狭义概念。未来的研究应该更多地关注相对未开发的技术领域,而不是分配决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号