首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Endocrine Society >Significance of Discordant Results: between Confirmatory Tests in Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism
【2h】

Significance of Discordant Results: between Confirmatory Tests in Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism

机译:不和谐结果的意义:诊断诊断的诊断测试中

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Context: Current clinical guidelines recommend confirmation of positive result in at least one confirmatory test in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA). Clinical implication of multiple confirmatory tests has not been established, especially when patients show discordant results. Objective: The aim of the present study was to explore the role of two confirmatory tests in subtype diagnosis of PA. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting: The study was conducted at two referral centers. Participants and Method: We identified 360 hypertensive patients who underwent both captopril challenge test (CCT) and saline infusion test (SIT) and exhibited at least one positive result. Among them, we studied 193 patients with PA whose data were available for subtype diagnosis based on adrenal vein sampling (AVS). Main Outcome Measure: The prevalence of bilateral subtype on AVS according to the results of the confirmatory tests. Results: Of patients studied, 127 were positive for both CCT and SIT (double-positive), while 66 were positive for either CCT or SIT (single-positive) (n = 34 and n = 32, respectively). Altogether, 135 were diagnosed with bilateral subtype on AVS. The single-positive patients had milder clinical features of PA than the double-positive patients. The prevalence of bilateral subtype on AVS was significantly higher in the single-positive patients than in the double-positive patients. (63/66 [95.5%] vs. 72/127 [56.7%], P < 0.01). Several clinical parameters were different between CCT single-positive and SIT single-positive patients. Conclusion: Patients with discordant results between CCT and SIT have a high probability of bilateral subtype of PA on AVS.
机译:背景信息:目前的临床指南建议确认在诊断原发性醛固酮(PA)的诊断中的至少一个确认测试中的阳性结果。尚未建立多种验证测试的临床意义,特别是当患者表现出不和谐的结果时。目的:本研究的目的是探讨两种确认试验在PA的亚型诊断中的作用。设计:回顾性横截面研究。环境:该研究在两个转介中心进行。参与者和方法:我们确定了360名高血压患者,接受了卡托普利挑战试验(CCT)和盐水输注试验(静置),并表现出至少一个阳性结果。其中,我们研究了193例PA患者,其数据可用于基于肾上腺静脉抽样(AVS)的亚型诊断。主要结果测量:根据确认测试结果的双侧亚型对双侧亚型的患病率。结果:研究患者,CCT和坐下(双阳性)为127次为阳性,而CCT的阳性为阳性(单阳性)(n = 34和n = 32)。完全,135人被诊断为AVS上的双侧亚型。单阳性患者比双阳性患者的临床特征较高。单阳性患者的双侧亚型对双侧亚型的患病率明显高于双阳性患者。 (63/66 [95.5%]与72/127 [56.7%],P <0.01)。 CCT单阳性和坐单阳性患者之间的几个临床参数不同。结论:CCT和坐在CCT之间不良导致的患者对AVS的PA的双侧亚型概率很高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号