首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Measuring Food Literacy: Progressing the Development of an International Food Literacy Survey Using a Content Validity Study
【2h】

Measuring Food Literacy: Progressing the Development of an International Food Literacy Survey Using a Content Validity Study

机译:测量食品识字:使用内容有效性研究进展国际食品扫盲调查的发展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The term “food literacy” is increasingly used to describe the knowledge, skills and behaviours needed to meet food needs. The aim of this research was to determine content validity for an International Food Literacy Survey. Methods: The literature was searched for existing items to form an item pool to measure the eleven components of food literacy. Expert consensus was investigated through two related online surveys. Round 1 participants were researchers who had been involved in the development of a food literacy measure (n = 18). Round 2 participants were authors of papers who had used the term (n = 85). Level of agreement was determined quantitatively using the Content Validity Index and compared to open ended qualitative comments. Results: Consensus was achieved on 119 items. Components varied in the ease with which existing validated items could be found and the number of items achieving consensus. Items related to food prepared within the home were more likely to achieve consensus. Additional issues included limited shared understanding of the scope of the term, the validity of items varying according to context and a limited health focus. Conclusions: This study provides a valuable basis upon which to progress the development of a measure.
机译:背景:术语“食物素养”越来越多地用于描述满足食物需求所需的知识,技能和行为。本研究的目的是确定国际食物扫盲调查的内容有效性。方法:搜索文献的现有物品以形成项目池以测量食物素养的11个组件。通过两个相关的在线调查调查了专家共识。第1轮参与者是参与开发食品扫盲措施的研究人员(n = 18)。第2轮参与者是使用该术语的论文的作者(n = 85)。与内容有效性指数相比,定量使用内容有效性指数确定协议级别。结果:119项实现了共识。可以轻松变化的组件可以找到现有的验证项目以及实现共识的项目数。与房屋内准备的食物有关的物品更有可能达成共识。附加问题包括有限的共享了解期限范围,根据上下文和有限的健康焦点,物品的有效性。结论:本研究提供了有价值的基础,在此方面取得了一种措施的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号