首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Epidemiology >Invited Commentary: Examining Sex/Gender Differences in Risk of Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias—Challenges and Future Directions
【2h】

Invited Commentary: Examining Sex/Gender Differences in Risk of Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias—Challenges and Future Directions

机译:特邀评论:检查阿尔茨海默氏病和相关痴呆症风险中的性别/性别差异—挑战和未来方向

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The majority of people living with Alzheimer disease (AD) and related dementias are women. Longer life expectancy is one factor thought to contribute to this observation, but possible sex-specific biological mechanisms have received considerable attention from the research community. In the current issue of the , Buckley et al. ( . 2019;188(7):1213–1223) use death certificate information on all deaths occurring among adults aged ≥60 years in Australia between 2006 and 2014 to evaluate sex/gender differences in rates of death with dementia (all types), AD dementia, and vascular dementia listed on the death certificate. The paper by Buckley et al. highlights several important methodological challenges for research examining sex/gender differences in risk of AD and related dementias, including challenges in measurement, survival bias and competing risks, and selection bias arising from sample selection. The current evidence on possible sex-specific biological risk factors for AD is intriguing, but there are numerous alternative explanations for differences in AD dementia and AD biomarkers between women and men. Triangulation of evidence from study designs with different strengths and weaknesses and transdisciplinary collaboration will be vital to generating conclusive evidence about sex/gender differences in risk of AD and related dementias.
机译:患有阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)和相关痴呆症的大多数人是女性。更长的预期寿命是促成这一观察结果的因素之一,但是可能的针对性别的生物学机制已引起研究界的广泛关注。在本期杂志中,Buckley等人。 (。2019; 188(7):1213-1223)使用死亡证明信息,了解2006年至2014年间澳大利亚≥60岁成年人中发生的所有死亡,以评估痴呆(所有类型)死亡率的性别差异,死亡证明中列出了AD痴呆和血管性痴呆。 Buckley等人的论文。重点介绍了研究AD风险和相关痴呆症中性别差异的几个重要的方法论挑战,包括测量方面的挑战,生存偏向和竞争风险以及样本选择所引起的选择偏向。关于AD可能的性别特异性生物危险因素的最新证据很有趣,但是对于男女痴呆和AD生物标志物的差异,有许多替代性解释。对具有不同优缺点和跨学科合作的研究设计的证据进行三角剖分,对于生成关于AD和相关痴呆风险中性别差异的确凿证据至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号