首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Human Kinetics >Acute Effects of a Static Vs. a Dynamic Stretching Warm-up on Repeated-Sprint Performance in Female Handball Players
【2h】

Acute Effects of a Static Vs. a Dynamic Stretching Warm-up on Repeated-Sprint Performance in Female Handball Players

机译:静态vs的急性影响。女子手球运动员反复冲刺表现的动态伸展热身

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This randomized cross-over study examined the effects of typical static and dynamic stretching warm-up protocols on repeated-sprint performance. Thirteen young female handball players performed a 5 min aerobic warm-up followed by one of three stretching protocols for the lower limbs: (1) static stretching, (2) dynamic-ballistic stretching, and (3) no stretching before performing five all-out sprints on a cycle ergometer. Each protocol was performed on a different occasion, separated by 2-3 days. Range of movement (ROM) was also measured before and after the warm-up protocols with a sit-and-reach test. Fixed and random effects of each stretching protocol on repeated sprint performance were estimated with mixed linear modeling and data were evaluated via standardization and magnitude-based inferences. In comparison to no stretching, there were small increases in ROM after dynamic stretching (12.7%, ±0.7%; mean, ±90% confidence limits) and static stretching (19.2%, ±0.9%). There were small increases in the average power across all sprints with dynamic stretching relative to static stretching (3.3%, ±2.4%) and no stretching (3.0%, ±2.4%) and trivial to small increases in the average power in the 1st and 5th trials with dynamic stretching compared to static stretching (3.9%, ±2.6%; 2.6%, ±2.6%, respectively) and no stretching (2.0%, ±2.7%; 4.1%, ±2.8%, respectively). There were also trivial and small decreases in power across all sprints with static relative to dynamic stretching (-1.3%, ±2.8%) and no stretching (-3.5%, ±2.9%). Dynamic stretching improved repeated-sprint performance to a greater extent than static stretching and no stretching.
机译:这项随机交叉研究检查了典型静态和动态拉伸预热方案对重复冲刺性能的影响。 13名年轻的女手球运动员进行了5分钟的有氧热身,随后进行了下肢的三种拉伸方案之一:(1)静态拉伸,(2)动态弹道拉伸和(3)在进行五次全能之前没有拉伸在自行车测功机上冲刺。每种协议在不同的情况下执行,间隔2-3天。运动范围(ROM)的测量还包括在预热协议前后进行的就坐测试。混合线性建模可评估每种拉伸方案对重复冲刺性能的固定和随机影响,并通过标准化和基于幅度的推论评估数据。与没有拉伸相比,动态拉伸(12.7%,±0.7%;平均值,±90%置信极限)和静态拉伸(19.2%,±0.9%)后,ROM的增加很小。动态拉伸相对于静态拉伸(3.3%,±2.4%)和无拉伸(3.0%,±2.4%)的所有sprint的平均功率都有小幅增加,并且第一和第二个平均功率的变化很小至很小与静态拉伸(分别为3.9%,±2.6%,2.6%,±2.6%)和不拉伸(分别为2.0%,±2.7%,4.1%,±2.8%)相比,动态拉伸的第5次试验。在相对于动态拉伸为静态(-1.3%,±2.8%)而没有拉伸(-3.5%,±2.9%)的情况下,所有冲刺的功率都有微不足道的小幅下降。与静态拉伸和不拉伸相比,动态拉伸在更大程度上改善了重复冲刺性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号