首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Fidelity of Implementation in Project Towards No Drug Abuse (TND): A Comparison of Classroom Teachers and Program Specialists
【2h】

Fidelity of Implementation in Project Towards No Drug Abuse (TND): A Comparison of Classroom Teachers and Program Specialists

机译:在不滥用药物的项目中贯彻执行的保真度:课堂教师和计划专家的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper presents the results of an effectiveness trial of Project Towards No Drug Abuse [TND], in which we compared program delivery by regular classroom teachers and program specialists within the same high schools. Within 18 schools that were randomly assigned to the program or control conditions, health classrooms were assigned to program delivery by teachers or (outside) specialists. Classroom sessions were observed by pairs of observers to assess three domains of implementation fidelity: adherence, classroom process, and perceived student acceptance of the program. Pre- and immediate posttest survey data were collected from 2331 students. Of the four composite indexes of implementation fidelity that were examined, only one (quality of delivery) showed a difference between specialists and teachers, with marginally higher ratings of specialists (p < .10). Both teachers and program specialists achieved effects on three of the five immediate outcome measures, including program-specific knowledge, addiction concern, and social self-control. Students’ posttest ratings of the program overall and the quality of program delivery failed to reveal differences between the teacher- and specialist-led classrooms. These results suggest that motivated, trained classroom teachers can implement evidence-based prevention programs with fidelity and achieve immediate effects.
机译:本文介绍了“禁止滥用药物”计划(TND)的有效性试验的结果,在该试验中,我们比较了同一所高中常规班级老师和计划专家的计划交付情况。在随机分配给计划或控制条件的18所学校中,健康教室由教师或(外部)专家分配给计划交付。一对观察员对课堂进行了观察,以评估实施保真度的三个领域:遵守,课堂过程和学生对计划的接受程度。测验前和测验后的调查数据来自2331名学生。在检查的四个实施忠实度综合指标中,只有一个(交付质量)显示专家与教师之间存在差异,专家的评分略高(p <.10)。教师和计划专家都对五项立即结果指标中的三项产生了影响,包括针对计划的知识,对成瘾的关注和对社会的自我控制。学生对课程整体的后测评价和课程交付的质量未能揭示出教师主导和专家主导的教室之间的差异。这些结果表明,积极进取,训练有素的课堂教师可以忠实地实施基于证据的预防计划,并取得立竿见影的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号