首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sofosbuvir Compared to Current Standard Treatment in Swiss Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C
【2h】

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sofosbuvir Compared to Current Standard Treatment in Swiss Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C

机译:瑞士慢性丙型肝炎患者中索非布韦与现行标准治疗相比的成本-效果分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In clinical trials, sofosbuvir showed high antiviral activity in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) across all genotypes. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based treatment compared to current standard treatment in mono-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotypes 1–4 in Switzerland. Cost-effectiveness was modelled from the perspective of the Swiss health care system using a lifetime Markov model. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) used an endpoint of cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Treatment characteristics, quality of life, and transition probabilities were obtained from published literature. Country-specific model inputs such as patient characteristics, mortality and costs were obtained from Swiss sources. We performed extensive sensitivity analyses. Costs and effects were discounted at 3% (range: 0–5%) per year. Sofosbuvir-containing treatment in mixed cohorts of cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with CHC genotypes 1–4 showed ICERs between CHF 10,337 and CHF 91,570 per QALY gained. In subgroup analyses, sofosbuvir dominated telaprevir- and boceprevir-containing treatment in treatment-naïve genotype 1 cirrhotic patients. ICERs of sofosbuvir were above CHF 100,000 per QALY in treatment-naïve, interferon eligible, non-cirrhotic patients infected with genotypes 2 or 3. In deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, results were generally robust. From a Swiss health care system perspective, treatment of mixed cohorts of cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with CHC genotypes 1–4 with sofosbuvir-containing treatment versus standard treatment would be cost-effective if a threshold of CHF 100,000 per QALY was assumed.
机译:在临床试验中,索非布韦在所有基因型的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者中均表现出较高的抗病毒活性。我们的目的是确定在瑞士单药感染的慢性C型(CHC)基因型1-4的患者中,与当前标准治疗相比,基于索非布韦的治疗的成本效益。成本效益是使用终身马尔可夫模型从瑞士医疗保健系统的角度建模的。增量成本效益比(ICER)使用获得的每质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本终点。治疗特征,生活质量和转移概率从发表的文献中获得。从瑞士获得了针对特定国家的模型输入,例如患者特征,死亡率和费用。我们进行了广泛的敏感性分析。成本和效果折现为每年3%(范围:0–5%)。在患有CHC基因型1-4的肝硬化和非肝硬化患者的混合队列中,含Sofosbuvir的治疗显示,每QALY获得的ICER在10,337至91,570瑞士法郎之间。在亚组分析中,对于未接受过治疗的基因型1肝硬化患者,索非布韦在含telaprevir和boceprevir的治疗中占优势。初治,符合干扰素标准且感染了基因型2或3的非肝硬化患者中,sofosbuvir的ICERs每QALY高于100,000瑞士法郎。在确定性和概率敏感性分析中,结果通常是可靠的。从瑞士卫生保健系统的角度来看,如果假设每个QALY阈值为100,000瑞士法郎,则采用含sofosbuvir的治疗与标准治疗相结合的1-4例CHC基因型为1-4的肝硬化和非肝硬化患者的混合治疗将具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号