首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Effects of Direction of Exertion Path and Load Placement in Nursing Cart Pushing and Pulling Tasks: An Electromyographical Study
【2h】

The Effects of Direction of Exertion Path and Load Placement in Nursing Cart Pushing and Pulling Tasks: An Electromyographical Study

机译:运动方向路径和负荷放置在护理车推拉任务中的影响:一项肌电图研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of direction of exertion (DOE) (pushing, pulling), path (walking in a straight line, turning left, walking uphill), and load placement (LP) (the 18 blocks were indicated by X, Y and Z axis; there were 3 levels on the X axis, 2 levels on the Y axis, and 3 levels on the Z axis) on muscle activity and ratings of perceived exertion in nursing cart pushing and pulling tasks. Ten participants who were female students and not experienced nurses were recruited to participate in the experiment. Each participant performed 108 experimental trials in the study, consisting of 2 directions of exertion (push and pull), 3 paths, and 18 load placements (indicated by X, Y and Z axes). A 23kg load was placed into one load placement. The dependent variables were electromyographic (EMG) data of four muscles collected bilaterally as follows: Left (L) and right (R) trapezius (TR), flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), extensor digitorum (ED), and erector spinae (ES) and subjective ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). Split-split-plot ANOVA was conducted to analyze significant differences between DOE, path, and LP in the EMG and RPE data. Pulling cart tasks produced a significantly higher activation of the muscles (RTR:54.4%, LTR:50.3%, LFDS:57.0%, LED:63.4%, RES:40.7%, LES:36.7%) than pushing cart tasks (RTR:42.4%, LTR:35.1%, LFDS:32.3%, LED:55.1%, RES:33.3%, LES:32.1%). A significantly greater perceived exertion was found in pulling cart tasks than pushing cart tasks. Significantly higher activation of all muscles and perceived exertion were observed for walking uphill than walking in a straight line and turning left. Significantly lower muscle activity of all muscles and subject ratings were observed for the central position on the X axis, the bottom position on the Y axis, and the posterior position on the Z axis. These findings suggest that nursing staff should adopt forward pushing when moving a nursing cart, instead of backward pulling, and that uphill paths should be avoided in the design of work environments. In terms of distribution of the load in a nursing cart, heavier materials should be positioned at bottom of the cabinet, centered on the horizontal plane and close to the handle, to reduce the physical load of the nursing staff.
机译:这项研究的目的是探讨运动方向(DOE)(推,拉),路径(直线行走,向左转,上坡行走)和负荷放置(LP)的影响(指示了18个街区在X,Y和Z轴上;在X轴上有3个级别,在Y轴上有2个级别,在Z轴上有3个级别)。招募了十名女学生而不是经验丰富的护士参加该实验。每个参与者进行了108次实验试验,包括2个运动方向(推拉),3个路径和18个负荷放置(由X,Y和Z轴指示)。将23kg的负载放入一个负载放置中。因变量是双侧采集的四块肌肉的肌电图(EMG)数据,如下所示:左(L)和右(R)斜方肌(TR),指浅屈肌(FDS),指伸伸肌(ED)和竖脊肌(ES)和主观评价的劳累程度(RPE)。进行了分割-分割图方差分析以分析EMG和RPE数据中DOE,路径和LP之间的显着差异。拉车任务比推车任务(RTR:42.4)产生更高的肌肉激活(RTR:54.4%,LTR:50.3%,LFDS:57.0%,LED:63.4%,RES:40.7%,LES:36.7%) %,LTR:35.1%,LFDS:32.3%,LED:55.1%,RES:33.3%,LES:32.1%)。在推拉车任务中发现比推推车任务显着更大的感知工作量。上山行走比直线行走和向左拐弯走路时,所有肌肉的激活和感觉到的劳力明显提高。在X轴的中心位置,Y轴的底部位置和Z轴的后部位置,观察到所有肌肉的肌肉活动明显降低,并且受试者的等级得到了降低。这些发现表明,护理人员在移动护理车时应采用向前推动而不是向后拉,并且在工作环境设计中应避免上坡路。就护理推车中的负载分配而言,应将更重的材料放置在机柜底部,以水平面为中心并靠近手柄的位置,以减轻护理人员的身体负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号